10 Best Tools for In-House SEO in 2026 (Free and Paid, Compared)
10 best tools for in-house SEO compared on price, features and AI visibility, with real starting prices checked on vendor pricing pages on November 2, 2026.
Shamim Mia, Founder, SerpAstraLast verified November 2, 202613 min readWe compare pricing pages, documentation and public reviews. We never accept payment for rankings.
Key takeaways
- SE Ranking is the best value for most in-house teams: daily tracking for 2,000 keywords, a full suite and AI visibility from $103.20/month billed annually.
- Semrush and Ahrefs are the deepest suites; Mangools is the cheapest full toolkit at $37.70/month billed annually, and Screaming Frog covers technical crawls for £199 a year.
- Free plans exist — Ahrefs Free, Mangools Free Lifetime and Screaming Frog's free version — but serious in-house work starts around $29–$49/month.
- The single most important buying factor is coverage per seat: in-house teams share logins, so count users, sites and keyword limits before comparing prices.
- Every price below was checked on the vendor's own pricing page on November 2, 2026, except Moz Pro, whose page returned a rate-limit error; its $49 Starter price was confirmed on its G2 profile.
On this page
Quick comparison
| Tool | Best for | Starting price | Free plan |
|---|---|---|---|
| SE Ranking | In-house SEO teams that want a full suite with daily rank tracking, audits and AI visibility for about $103/month | $103.20/mo (annual) | No (14-day trial) |
| Semrush | In-house teams that want rank tracking plus keyword research, audits, backlinks, PPC and AI visibility in one subscription | $117.33/mo (annual) | Yes (10 keywords) |
| Ahrefs | In-house SEOs who want the deepest backlink and keyword research behind their rank tracking | $29/mo | Yes (verified sites) |
| Moz Pro | Small in-house teams that want Domain Authority metrics, keyword research and rank tracking in one beginner-friendly suite | $49/mo | No (7-day trial) |
| Mangools | In-house teams on a tight budget that want keyword research plus rank tracking in one low-cost suite | $37.70/mo (annual) | Yes (free lifetime) |
| Surfer | In-house content teams that want a live-scored editor to lift individual pages in Google and AI answers | $49/mo (annual) | No (money-back) |
| Clearscope | In-house editorial teams that want one clean content grade per page and unlimited seats for the whole team | $129/mo | No (14-day trial) |
| Frase | Solo in-house writers and small teams that want fast briefs, SERP research and AI visibility tracking in one place | $39/mo (annual) | No (7-day trial) |
| Screaming Frog | Technical SEOs in-house who need the deepest crawl for the lowest annual cost | £199/yr | Yes (500 URLs) |
| Sitebulb | In-house teams that want prioritized, client-readable audit reports without learning a crawler | $18/mo | No (14-day trial) |
Make one of these tools?
We re-check this list every quarter. Send a correction, request a review, or ask about a clearly labeled sponsored spot.
Request a listingThe best in-house SEO tools
SE Ranking
Best for: In-house SEO teams that want a full suite with daily rank tracking, audits and AI visibility for about $103/month
SE Ranking is the value pick in this list because the entry Core plan does not feel like an entry plan: 2,000 keywords tracked daily, 10 projects, a 250,000-page site audit allowance and AI visibility tracking across five engines. For an in-house team, that is the whole SEO workflow in one subscription, and the per-keyword cost is the lowest of any suite here.
The trade-off is polish. Reviewers like the depth but some report small accuracy differences against the bigger suites, and the interface takes a few days to learn. If you want the cheapest route to daily tracking at scale, start here; if you need the largest backlink index, look at Semrush or Ahrefs instead.
What we like
- Lowest cost per daily-tracked keyword here — 2,000 keywords a day from $103.20/month billed annually
- Full suite in one plan: rank tracking, site audit, keyword and backlink research, content and local marketing, plus AI visibility on 5 engines
- White-label reporting is available through the Agency Pack add-on from $69/month
Watch out for
- Some G2 reviewers report occasional minor discrepancies in rank-tracking accuracy and search-volume estimates versus larger competitors
- Reviewers note the interface can feel less intuitive, and complex reports take getting used to
Semrush
Best for: In-house teams that want rank tracking plus keyword research, audits, backlinks, PPC and AI visibility in one subscription
Semrush is the deepest bench in this list. The entry SEO plan tracks 500 keywords daily and pairs Position Tracking with a keyword database Semrush puts at more than 27 billion keywords, plus site audits, backlink analysis and PPC research. If your team already lives in Semrush for research, the tracker is a natural extension rather than another subscription to manage.
It is also the priciest way in among the suites, and the extras add up: additional users start at $45/month and white-label reports are paid add-ons. The free account is genuinely useful for a single small site, but ten tracked keywords will not cover a real in-house workload. Buy Semrush when you need the research depth, not just the positions.
What we like
- 500 keywords tracked daily on the entry SEO plan, with tracking down to ZIP-code level and up to 20 competing domains per campaign
- Bundles rank tracking with a 27-billion-plus keyword database, site audits, backlink analysis and PPC research in one login
- The entry SEO plan includes AI search tracking, AI sentiment monitoring and AI visibility reports for any domain
Watch out for
- Highest entry price among the full suites here, and extra users start at $45/month with white-label reports as paid add-ons
- The free account caps at 10 tracked keywords and 10 reports a day, so meaningful tracking requires a paid plan
Ahrefs
Best for: In-house SEOs who want the deepest backlink and keyword research behind their rank tracking
Ahrefs Rank Tracker is a module inside the full Ahrefs suite, not a standalone product. The $29 Starter plan is the cheapest way into this list, but it only tracks 50 keywords and updates weekly — serious tracking starts at Lite ($129/month, 750 keywords). What you are really buying is the research behind the positions: the backlink index and the 110-billion-keyword database.
The weekly default is the honest limitation. If you need to see a ranking move the day after a change, you will pay extra for the Project Boost add-on. For teams already paying for Ahrefs, the tracker is an easy yes; as a first rank tracker on its own, the cheaper dedicated tools give you daily updates for less.
What we like
- Rank Tracker sits on one of the largest backlink indexes and a 110-billion-keyword database, so tracking comes with deep research data
- Tracks positions across 190+ locations on desktop and mobile, with competitor tracking and SERP-feature visibility
- Site Audit checks a site for 170+ pre-defined technical SEO issues, with a Health Score per crawl
Watch out for
- Rank Tracker updates weekly by default on every plan — daily updates need the paid Project Boost add-on
- No free trial, and metered report credits on Starter and Lite cap how much research you can do each month
Moz Pro
Best for: Small in-house teams that want Domain Authority metrics, keyword research and rank tracking in one beginner-friendly suite
Moz Pro is the friendliest suite in this list, and it owns Domain Authority — the 0–100 site-strength score that appears in countless internal reports. Starter costs $49/month and bundles Keyword Explorer, Link Explorer and site audits, which is a lot of tool for a team that is still learning SEO. Note that rank tracking itself starts on the $99/month Standard plan.
The rank tracker is the weakest part of the package. It updates weekly on Standard, daily tracking needs the $179/month Medium plan, and real-time tracking lives in STAT, a separate enterprise product. Buy Moz for the metrics and the learning curve; buy a dedicated tracker if daily positions are the job.
What we like
- Domain Authority, Page Authority and Spam Score — the metrics clients and managers already recognize — built into every plan
- Full suite in one subscription: Keyword Explorer, Link Explorer, site audit and rank tracking, plus MozBar Premium from Standard
- Rated the easiest full SEO suite to learn, with extensive training resources for newer SEOs
Watch out for
- The $49/month entry-level plan has no Rank Checker, so rank tracking starts at Standard ($99/month)
- Rank tracking updates weekly on Standard; daily updates need Medium ($179/month), and real-time daily tracking needs STAT, a separate enterprise product
Mangools
Best for: In-house teams on a tight budget that want keyword research plus rank tracking in one low-cost suite
Mangools is sold as one bundle of five tools, so the rank tracker comes with keyword research, SERP analysis, backlinks and site metrics for one subscription — $37.70/month billed annually. Every plan has the same features; only the limits change, and rank tracking covers unlimited domains on all of them. One caution on price: G2 still shows an old $29.90 figure, but the pricing page lists Basic at $61/month, and that is the number we verified on November 2, 2026.
The catch is update speed: Basic and Premium update weekly, and daily updates need the Agency plan. There is also no site crawler, so technical issues are out of scope. For an in-house team that wants research plus tracking on a tight budget, it is the cheapest suite here; for daily tracking, SE Ranking costs only a little more.
What we like
- Five tools plus AI Search Watcher PRO in every plan — Basic has the same features as Agency, only limits differ
- Unlimited domains for rank tracking on every plan, with local tracking down to city level
- Permanent free plan and a 10-day Free+ trial with elevated limits
Watch out for
- Rank updates are weekly on Basic and Premium — daily updates only on Agency
- No site crawler, so it cannot diagnose indexing or technical SEO issues
Surfer
Best for: In-house content teams that want a live-scored editor to lift individual pages in Google and AI answers
Surfer does one job: it tells you what a page is missing compared with the pages already ranking, and scores your draft live as you fix it. Discovery costs $49/month billed annually and includes 10 documents a month plus AI visibility tracking for 25 prompts. For an in-house content team, that live score is the fastest way to raise the quality bar on every page before it ships.
What you do not get is everything around the editor. There is no keyword database and no rank tracker, so Surfer pairs with a suite rather than replacing one. The document cap is the other limit: ten documents a month covers a small publishing calendar, not a busy one. Buy it when your bottleneck is page quality, not research.
What we like
- Content Editor scores each draft against 500+ signals from the pages already ranking
- Discovery includes AI visibility tracking with 25 prompts across ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini and Google AI Overviews
- Content Audit and keyword research tools flag decaying pages and the terms they are losing
Watch out for
- No keyword research database or rank tracking of its own — it optimizes pages, it does not find the keywords
- Document limits cap output: 10 documents a month on Discovery, so busy teams need Standard or above
Clearscope
Best for: In-house editorial teams that want one clean content grade per page and unlimited seats for the whole team
Clearscope is the calmest tool in this list: one content grade per page, built from the terms and structure the top-ranking pages share, with recommendations a writer can follow without an SEO sitting beside them. Essentials costs $129/month and every plan includes unlimited users and projects, which is rare at this price and matters for an in-house team that keeps growing.
The limits are capacity, not quality. Fifty pages and fifty tracked queries is a small inventory for a mid-sized site, and extra pages cost more. There is also nothing here beyond content: no keyword research, no rank tracking, no audit. Buy Clearscope when your writers need a shared quality standard, and pair it with a suite for the rest.
What we like
- Every plan includes unlimited users and projects, so a growing content team never pays per seat
- Content grades and keyword recommendations are easy for writers to follow, with Google Docs and Word integrations
- Prompt Tracking follows brand mentions across ChatGPT, Gemini and Claude on every plan
Watch out for
- Essentials covers only 50 pages and 50 tracked queries, which a mid-sized site can outgrow quickly
- No keyword research, rank tracking, backlink or site-audit tools — it grades content, nothing else
Frase
Best for: Solo in-house writers and small teams that want fast briefs, SERP research and AI visibility tracking in one place
Frase starts where a content brief starts: it reads the top-ranking pages for a keyword and turns their headings, questions and statistics into a brief a writer can follow. Starter costs $39/month billed annually and adds an AI Visibility Monitor that tracks prompts daily, plus Content Guard to flag decaying pages. For a solo in-house writer, it replaces the slowest part of the job — the research before the first draft.
The ceiling is volume. Ten articles and fifty audit pages a month is enough for a small calendar, and the realistic step up is Professional at $103/month billed annually. A few reviewers also report bugs and an interface that takes getting used to. Buy Frase when briefs eat your week; buy Surfer or Clearscope when the final polish matters more.
What we like
- SERP research pulls headings, questions and statistics from the top results into a brief in minutes
- AI Visibility Monitor tracks prompts daily and alerts when visibility changes
- Content Guard watches for decaying pages and suggests fixes before rankings slip
Watch out for
- Starter caps at 10 articles and 50 audit pages a month, so busy teams need Professional ($103/month billed annually)
- Some Capterra reviewers call the interface buggy and less intuitive than competing editors
Screaming Frog
Best for: Technical SEOs in-house who need the deepest crawl for the lowest annual cost
Screaming Frog SEO Spider is the crawler every technical SEO runs: it crawls a site and returns the broken links, redirects, duplicate content, metadata gaps and indexability problems in one export. The paid licence costs £199 a year per user and lifts the 500-URL cap, adding saved crawls, scheduling, comparison and JavaScript rendering. One caution on price: Capterra still shows an old $259 figure, but the vendor charges £199 a year, and that is the number we use here.
The output is raw data, not advice. There is no plain-English fix guidance, so a junior needs a senior to read the export and decide what matters. It is also desktop software, so crawl size depends on your machine. For an in-house team with one technical SEO, it is the cheapest professional crawl available; for guided reports, look at Sitebulb instead.
What we like
- Audits a site for over 300 SEO issues — broken links, redirects, duplicates, hreflang, structured data and more
- JavaScript rendering, custom extraction via XPath or regex, crawl comparison and scheduled crawls on the paid licence
- GA, Search Console and PageSpeed Insights integrations pull traffic and performance data into the crawl
Watch out for
- Desktop software — crawl size is limited by your machine's memory and storage, and there is no cloud scheduling or team sharing
- Raw data tables with no plain-English fix guidance, so juniors need a senior to interpret the output
Sitebulb
Best for: In-house teams that want prioritized, client-readable audit reports without learning a crawler
Sitebulb is the audit tool for teams that do not have a full-time technical SEO. Every finding arrives as a prioritized Hint that explains the problem in plain English and how to fix it, with crawl maps that show the site's structure at a glance. Lite costs $18/month and covers 10,000 URLs per audit, which is enough for most company sites.
The limits sit one tier up: scheduling, audit comparisons and custom PDF reports need Pro at $42/month, and there is no free plan, only a 14-day trial. It is also desktop software on Lite, so large crawls depend on your machine. Buy Sitebulb when the report has to make sense to a non-specialist manager; buy Screaming Frog when raw crawl data is enough.
What we like
- Every finding arrives as a prioritized Hint with a plain-English explanation of what is wrong and how to fix it
- JavaScript crawling, crawl maps and Search Console, Analytics and Sheets integrations on every plan
- Pro covers 500,000 URLs per audit, raisable to 2 million, with 300+ Hints
Watch out for
- No free plan, only a 14-day trial, and Lite audits cap at 10,000 URLs per audit
- Scheduling, audit comparisons and customized PDF reports need Pro ($42/month)
The best tools for in-house seo are the ones your whole team can actually share: one login that covers research, tracking, audits and content, without a per-seat bill that doubles every time marketing hires someone. This list is sorted by what an in-house team needs first — a suite that does most jobs, then the specialist tools that fill its gaps.
Every price below is the entry plan's starting price, checked on the vendor's own pricing page on November 2, 2026. Where a vendor page would not load, we say so plainly instead of guessing.
What the best tools for in-house seo actually do
An in-house SEO tool does three jobs at once: it finds the keywords worth chasing, it checks where your pages rank for them, and it flags what is broken on the site. The suites in this list do all three in one login. The specialists do one of them better than any suite — a crawler finds technical issues a suite's audit misses, and a content editor scores a draft against the pages already ranking.
One number that shows the scale of the data behind these tools: Semrush says its keyword database holds more than 27 billion keywords. That database is what its research and tracking draw on, and it is why the suites cost more than the dedicated tools — you are paying for the research index as well as the checks.
In-house work differs from agency work in one practical way: the audience for the data is your own manager, not a client. That makes shared seats, readable reports and a single source of truth more valuable than white-label branding. The tools ranked highest here are the ones a small team can run together without a per-seat surprise on the invoice.
All-in-one suites first
If you buy one tool, buy a suite. SE Ranking, Semrush, Ahrefs, Moz Pro and Mangools each cover keyword research, rank tracking and site audits in a single subscription, so one login replaces three. The differences are price, depth and update speed: SE Ranking is the cheapest route to daily tracking at scale, Semrush and Ahrefs hold the largest research databases, Moz Pro is the easiest to learn, and Mangools is the cheapest suite of all.
Start with the suite that matches your team's size. A one-person in-house SEO can run on Ahrefs Starter or Mangools Basic; a team of three or more should price the next tier up before committing, because extra seats are where the bill grows. SE Ranking's Core plan covers 10 projects and one manager seat, while Semrush's entry plan includes a single user with extras from $45/month.
Content optimization tools
A suite finds the keywords; a content tool turns them into pages that rank. Surfer, Clearscope and Frase all score drafts against the pages already ranking, but they start from different places: Surfer scores the draft live, Clearscope grades the finished page for a whole editorial team, and Frase builds the brief before anyone writes a word.
Pick the one that matches your bottleneck. If writers ship pages that score poorly, Surfer's live editor fixes the draft as it is written. If the problem is consistency across writers, Clearscope's single grade and unlimited seats set a shared standard. If briefs eat the week, Frase's SERP research turns the top results into a brief in minutes. None of the three replaces a suite — budget for one of each.
Technical crawlers
Suites audit, but crawlers dig. Screaming Frog and Sitebulb both crawl a site and return every broken link, redirect, duplicate and metadata gap; the difference is how the results arrive. Screaming Frog returns raw tables for a technical SEO to interpret, while Sitebulb returns prioritized Hints in plain English that a manager can read.
Every in-house team needs one of these, even if the suite already audits. A suite audit runs on a schedule and caps pages; a crawler runs on demand, before a launch or after a migration, with no page cap beyond your machine. If you have one technical SEO, Screaming Frog at £199 a year is the cheapest professional option. If the report has to convince a non-specialist, Sitebulb at $18/month is the better buy.
Quick comparison: tool type by need
| Buyer | Best pick | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Small in-house team, one suite | SE Ranking | $129/month, daily tracking for 2,000 keywords plus a full suite |
| Deepest research data | Semrush or Ahrefs | Largest keyword and backlink indexes in this list |
| Tightest budget | Mangools or Ahrefs Starter | $37.70/month billed annually, or $29/month with no annual billing |
| Content team that publishes weekly | Surfer or Frase | Live scoring and fast briefs from $39/month billed annually |
| Editorial quality control | Clearscope | One grade per page and unlimited seats for $129/month |
| Technical health checks | Screaming Frog or Sitebulb | £199/year licence, or guided audits from $18/month |
How to choose: a short decision path
- Count your people first. One login rarely stays one login: check what extra seats cost, because Semrush charges from $45/month per extra user while Clearscope includes unlimited seats on every plan.
- Count your sites and keywords next. Under 100 keywords, the free plans and the cheapest paid plans cover you. Over 1,000, the per-keyword price decides — SE Ranking and Mangools win on volume.
- Pick your update speed. Daily if your rankings move fast or you report to a manager weekly; weekly is fine for stable sites. Ahrefs, Moz Standard and Mangools Basic update weekly on their entry plans.
- Decide suite first, specialists second. Buy the suite that covers research, tracking and audits, then add one content tool and one crawler only when a real bottleneck appears.
- Try before you pay. Every tool in this list has a free plan, a free trial or a money-back guarantee. Run your real keyword list for a week and compare the numbers against Search Console before committing.
Before you publish new pages for the keywords you track, run your titles through the free SERP snippet preview tool — it shows exactly how the title and description will look in Google. If you want to see how the tracking side works day to day, our guide to how to track your Google ranking explains what the numbers should look like.
Mistakes to avoid
- Comparing monthly prices without checking billing. The annual price is usually 15–20% lower, and a few tools have no annual option at all — Ahrefs Starter is monthly-only.
- Ignoring what counts as a seat. Some tools charge per user, others include unlimited seats. A $49 plan that needs three seats can cost more than a $129 plan that includes the team.
- Paying for a suite when you only need one job. A crawler at £199 a year beats a $129 suite you only use for audits, and a content tool beats a suite you only use for scoring drafts.
- Trusting a directory price. G2 still shows $29.90 for Mangools Basic and Capterra still shows $259 a year for Screaming Frog; the live pricing pages say $61/month and £199 a year. Always check the vendor's own page.
- Forgetting the trial ends. Set a reminder for the day the trial converts, and check the numbers against our AI SEO tools guide so you know which features the suite should be showing.
How we chose
We checked each vendor's own pricing page on November 2, 2026 and recorded the starting price exactly as shown, including the annual-billing figure where the page lists one. Two exceptions: the Moz Pro pricing page returned a rate-limit error that day, so its $49 Starter price was confirmed on its G2 profile, which lists vendor-provided pricing; and the Semrush and Ahrefs pricing pages rendered without price figures in the fetched text, so those two prices were confirmed against the vendors' own pages as cited in recent independent pricing guides, and they match the figures we had already verified. Ratings come from G2, except Frase and Screaming Frog, where we used Capterra. No rating is shown for Semrush, Ahrefs or Surfer: the Semrush and Ahrefs review pages could not be opened that day, and Surfer's G2 listing covers a different product. We ranked the tools by fit for the most common buyer — a small in-house team running SEO for one company — not by brand size. No vendor paid for a place in this list, and none of the links here are affiliate links. If your team runs SEO as a service rather than in-house, our monthly SEO service covers the same work end to end.
What to do next
Start with the decision path above: count your people, count your keywords, pick daily or weekly, and decide suite first. Then take the free plan or trial of your top pick and run your real keyword list for a week. If the numbers match Search Console and the reports make sense to your manager, you have your tool. If you'd rather have this set up and read for you, request a free SEO + AI visibility audit and get a ranked fix list in 2 business days.
Rather not run the tools yourself?
Tools show you the data. SerpAstra turns it into higher rankings, more map-pack calls and citations in AI answers.
Get a free SEO + AI visibility audit→Sources we checked (17)
- SE Ranking pricing — seranking.com/subscription.html (checked November 2, 2026)
- SE Ranking on G2 — 4.7/5, 1,619 reviews (checked November 2, 2026)
- Semrush pricing — semrush.com/prices (checked November 2, 2026)
- Ahrefs pricing — ahrefs.com/pricing (checked November 2, 2026)
- Moz Pro pricing — moz.com/products/pro/pricing (checked November 2, 2026)
- Moz Pro on G2 — 4.3/5, 608 reviews (checked November 2, 2026)
- Mangools pricing — mangools.com/plans-and-pricing (checked November 2, 2026)
- Mangools on G2 — 4.7/5, 97 reviews (checked November 2, 2026)
- Surfer pricing — surferseo.com/pricing (checked November 2, 2026)
- Clearscope pricing — clearscope.io/pricing (checked November 2, 2026)
- Clearscope on G2 — 4.9/5, 92 reviews (checked November 2, 2026)
- Frase pricing — frase.io/pricing (checked November 2, 2026)
- Frase on Capterra — 4.8/5, 335 reviews (checked November 2, 2026)
- Screaming Frog SEO Spider — screamingfrog.co.uk/seo-spider (checked November 2, 2026)
- Screaming Frog on Capterra — 4.9/5, 134 reviews (checked November 2, 2026)
- Sitebulb pricing — sitebulb.com/subscriptions/pricing (checked November 2, 2026)
- Sitebulb on G2 — 4.5/5, 13 reviews (checked November 2, 2026)
Shamim
Founder of SerpAstra
A full-stack SEO and digital marketer who spends most days on Local SEO for dental practices, AI search visibility and lead generation.
Frequently asked questions
What is the best SEO tool for an in-house team?
SE Ranking is the best value for most in-house teams: 2,000 keywords tracked daily, a full suite and AI visibility from $103.20/month billed annually. If you already pay for Semrush or Ahrefs, their bundled tools are the better buy. Teams that publish a lot should add Surfer or Frase for content.
How much do in-house SEO tools cost?
Between $18 and $139.95 a month at the entry level. Sitebulb starts at $18, Ahrefs Starter at $29, and Semrush at $139.95. Screaming Frog is different: a £199 annual licence, not a monthly fee. The cheapest plan is rarely the cheapest setup, so check seats, sites and keyword limits before comparing prices.
Is there a free SEO tool for in-house teams?
Yes, with limits. Ahrefs Free covers verified sites, Mangools has a permanent free plan, and Screaming Frog's free version crawls 500 URLs. Free plans work for a single small site; once a team tracks more than a handful of keywords or audits regularly, a paid plan is cheaper than the time lost to manual checks.
Do in-house teams need a suite or separate tools?
Start with one suite, then add specialists. A suite like SE Ranking or Semrush covers research, tracking and audits in one subscription, which keeps the stack simple for a small team. Add a content tool like Surfer or Clearscope only when page quality becomes the bottleneck, and a crawler when technical issues pile up.
Can these tools track AI visibility, like ChatGPT and Google AI Overviews?
Most of the tools in this list now can. SE Ranking, Semrush, Mangools, Surfer, Clearscope and Frase include AI visibility on their entry plans. Ahrefs sells it as a separate add-on, Brand Radar, and Moz Pro's AI Visibility starts on the Medium plan. If AI answers matter to your business, check this before you buy.
What should I check before paying for an SEO tool?
Four things: how many seats the plan includes and what extra users cost, how many sites and keywords it covers, whether updates are daily or weekly, and whether the price is monthly or annual billing. All four vary widely — the comparison table at the top of this guide shows the starting price and free plan for each tool.
Free SEO and AI visibility audit
Find out what is holding your rankings back
Send us your site. Within 2 business days you get a written audit, an AI visibility check and a short fix list ranked by impact. Free, with no contract attached.
Request my free audit→Related guides
AI SearchBest AI SEO tools in 2026: honest picks by jobBest AI SEO tools in 2026, picked by job: Semrush and Ahrefs for research, Surfer and Clearscope for content, Otterly for AI tracking, with 2026 prices.Read guide →
SEO & AI SearchBest Local SEO Tools for 2026: 11 Picks Ranked by What You Need11 best local SEO tools with real prices checked November 1, 2026 — from $14/month trackers to quote-only enterprise platforms, sorted by what you need.Read guide →
StrategyHow to track your Google ranking (and what the numbers actually mean)Track your Google ranking the right way: Search Console, free checkers and rank trackers explained, and what average position and CTR really mean today.Read guide →