12 Best 360 Review Software in 2026: Pricing, Features and Pros & Cons
Compare the 12 best 360 review software tools on price, free plans and 360 feedback features, with prices checked on vendor pages on November 10, 2026.
We compare pricing pages, documentation and public reviews. We never accept payment for rankings.

Key takeaways
- Effy AI is the best fit for most small teams at $3/seat/month, free for up to 5 users; Teamflect follows at $9/user/month ($7 billed annually) with a free plan for up to 10 users, and PerformYard starts at $5/person/month.
- The single most important buying factor is how the tool charges: per seat per month, or per person reviewed. Count the people who will receive feedback, not the people you employ, before comparing any two prices.
- Three tools publish no starting price at all — Culture Amp, Qualtrics and Leapsome's final bill needs a quote — and Lattice and Engagedly both carry an annual minimum that decides the bill for small teams.
- Every price below was checked on the vendor's own pricing page, or a vendor-supplied listing, on November 10, 2026. Ratings are G2, except Teamflect and Pointerpro, which are Capterra.
On this page
Quick comparison
| Tool | Best for | Starting price | Free plan |
|---|---|---|---|
| Effy AI | Small teams of 10 to 300 that want a full 360 cycle running this week with no HR ops function | $3/mo | Yes (up to 5 users) |
| Teamflect | Microsoft 365 teams that want 360 reviews inside Teams without a separate app | $9/mo | Yes (up to 10 users) |
| PerformYard | Companies with a fixed review process that want the 360 workflow shaped around it | $5/mo | No (demo only) |
| Lattice | Companies at 150 to 500 employees that want 360 feedback inside a full performance platform | $10/mo | No (demo only) |
| 15Five | Companies of 100 to 1,000 investing in manager capability alongside the feedback itself | $11/mo | No (14-day trial) |
| Leapsome | Companies with a real learning function that want feedback routed into development paths | $14/mo | No (14-day trial) |
| Engagedly | Mid-market organizations that want performance, learning and engagement in one AI-driven suite | $5/mo | No (demo only) |
| Culture Amp | HR-mature organizations above 200 people already running engagement surveys | Custom quote | No (demo only) |
| Qualtrics | Organizations above roughly 1,000 employees with a people-analytics function | Custom quote | No (demo only) |
| Spidergap | Targeted leadership 360s in companies of any size, where only a few people get reviewed | $1,099/yr | No (1 free assessment) |
| CustomInsight | First-time 360 programmes that need design help as much as software | $95/person | No (1 person free) |
| Pointerpro | Consultants running 360s for clients, or a one-off internal exercise | $69/mo | No (14-day trial) |
Make one of these tools?
We re-check this list every quarter. Send a correction, request a review, or ask about a clearly labeled sponsored spot.
Request a listingThe best 360 review software
Effy AI
Best for: Small teams of 10 to 300 that want a full 360 cycle running this week with no HR ops function
Effy AI is the cheapest way to run a proper 360 cycle. From $3 a seat a month billed annually, a team gets AI-generated 360 questions written for each role, self, manager, peer and direct-report views in one cycle, and AI-written summaries per person. The free plan covers up to five users with full 360 access, so a small team can run a real cycle before paying anything.
The trade-off is youth. Effy AI is younger than the incumbents, so some edge-case reporting is still being built out, and it covers the performance layer only, with no payroll, ATS or learning tools. The free plan also has a sharp edge: once a sixth user joins, the team pays for all users, not just the extra one. Pick Effy AI when the team is small and wants a cycle this week.
What we like
- Cheapest starting price here at $3/seat/month billed annually, with a free plan for up to 5 users
- AI writes the 360 questions by role, nudges raters when an answer is too thin, and drafts the summary
- No seat minimum, no contract and no implementation fee, with billing pro-rated as headcount changes
- Highest G2 score in this list at 4.8 out of 5, with reviewers praising ease of use and fast setup
Watch out for
- Younger than the incumbents, so some edge-case reporting is still being built out
- No payroll, ATS or LMS, so it covers the performance layer only
- The free plan covers only 5 users, and paying for a sixth means paying for all users
Teamflect
Best for: Microsoft 365 teams that want 360 reviews inside Teams without a separate app
Teamflect is the lowest-friction option here for any company that runs on Microsoft Teams. Reviews happen inside Teams rather than in a separate tool, which does more for completion rates than any feature list. The free Starter plan covers up to 10 users with full functionality and no time limit, and Essential costs $9 a user a month billed monthly, or $7 billed annually.
The limits are the ecosystem and the reporting depth. A team that lives in Slack gets little value from Teamflect, and reviewers note that templates have limited customization beyond branding and that deeper analytics are thinner than on the full people platforms. Implementation support and training are free on every plan. Choose Teamflect when the company already lives in Microsoft 365.
What we like
- Only free plan here that runs a full 360 cycle for up to 10 users, with no time limit
- Reviews, goals, 1-on-1s and recognition happen inside Microsoft Teams, which lifts completion rates
- Essential at $9/user/month billed monthly ($7 billed annually) with free implementation support and training
- Nonprofits get up to 60% off, and paid plans carry no stated seat minimum
Watch out for
- Little value if the team lives in Slack rather than Microsoft Teams
- Review templates have limited customization beyond branding, per reviewers
- Deeper analytics and KPIs are thinner than on the full people platforms
PerformYard
Best for: Companies with a fixed review process that want the 360 workflow shaped around it
PerformYard does one job and lets you shape it almost without limits: review forms, rating scales, question types, cycle timing and approval routes are all configurable, which suits companies whose process does not match the standard template other tools assume. Pricing is published as a $5 to $10 per person per month range billed annually, and it covers 360 feedback and goal tracking without forcing an engagement suite on top.
The price is the honest weakness. There is no free plan and no self-serve trial, so every evaluation starts with a scheduled demo, and the real quote is form-gated behind a minimum the site does not state. AI features cost $1 to $3 per person a month extra. Pick PerformYard when the review process is fixed and the tool has to match it.
What we like
- Most configurable review cycles here: forms, rating scales, question types, timing and approval routes
- One flat rate covers 360 feedback, goals, check-ins and continuous feedback without forced engagement tools
- Onboarding, training and a dedicated success manager are included at no extra charge
- Volume discounts are available for larger teams, and engagement can be added at $1 to $3 per person
Watch out for
- No free plan and no self-serve trial; evaluation runs through a scheduled demo
- The real quote is form-gated, and the published range still leaves the exact price unknown
- AI features are a paid add-on at $1 to $3 per person per month, not included in the base plan
Lattice
Best for: Companies at 150 to 500 employees that want 360 feedback inside a full performance platform
Lattice is the scale pick in this list. Its 360 is solid and sits inside the deepest analytics stack in the category, with 360 and upward reviews, goals and OKRs, engagement surveys, one-on-ones, calibration and career frameworks. The Performance module costs $10 a seat a month billed annually, and Foundations bundles it with Goals and OKRs for $13.
The constraint is the floor price. A $4,000 minimum annual agreement means a 30-person programme costs $4,000 regardless of what the per-seat maths says, and there is no free plan or free trial. Modular pricing also adds up: Foundations plus Compensation and Grow reaches about $23 a seat. Choose Lattice when the company is past 150 people and wants 360 as one part of a full platform.
What we like
- Strongest review-cycle automation here, with 360 and upward reviews, calibration and career frameworks
- Largest review base in this list at 4.7 out of 5 on G2 from 4,098 reviews
- Foundations bundles Performance with Goals and OKRs for $13/seat/month, with analytics and an AI agent
- No implementation or change-management fees for the performance software, per Lattice
Watch out for
- A $4,000 minimum annual agreement, so a 30-person programme costs $4,000 regardless of the seat maths
- No free plan and no free trial; the entry module alone does not include engagement surveys
- Modular pricing adds up fast: Foundations plus Compensation and Grow reaches about $23 a seat
15Five
Best for: Companies of 100 to 1,000 investing in manager capability alongside the feedback itself
15Five wraps 360 in manager coaching and weekly check-ins, which is a reasonable answer to the follow-through problem: feedback lands in an ongoing conversation rather than in a PDF. Perform costs $11 a user a month billed annually and covers 360 reviews, weekly check-ins, one-on-ones, OKRs and High Fives recognition, with manager training content on top.
The trade-offs are billing and scope. Every plan is billed annually with no monthly option and no free plan, and Perform is a lot of platform if 360 is all you need. Coaching and compensation are paid add-ons, and reviewers cite repetitive check-in questions and rigid OKR tracking. Pick 15Five when managers are the weak link in the cycle.
What we like
- Wraps 360 reviews in weekly check-ins, 1-on-1s and manager coaching, so feedback lands in an ongoing conversation
- Perform at $11/user/month billed annually includes reviews, OKRs, check-ins and High Fives recognition
- Transparent published pricing across three plans, from Engage at $4 to Total Platform at $16
- AI cannot submit a review, so the writer chooses every rating
Watch out for
- Annual billing only, with no monthly option and no free plan
- A lot of platform if 360 is all you need; coaching and compensation are paid add-ons
- Reviewers cite repetitive check-in questions and rigid OKR tracking
Leapsome
Best for: Companies with a real learning function that want feedback routed into development paths
Leapsome connects 360 results to competency frameworks and learning modules, so a low score routes to something a person can actually do next. Performance Reviews cost $7 per employee a month, and every account starts with the Agentic HRIS Foundation at $7, so the list price for 360 is $14 per employee a month, with the Foundation free for purchases made by December 31, 2026.
The HRIS requirement is the catch. A company that already has an HRIS still pays for Leapsome's, and multi-module and volume discounts appear only in a custom quote. There is no free plan, only a 14-day trial. Choose Leapsome when the company has a real learning function and wants feedback and development in one system.
What we like
- Connects 360 results to competency frameworks and learning paths, so a low score routes to a next step
- Highest G2 score among the platforms here at 4.8 out of 5 from 2,422 reviews
- Module prices are published: Performance Reviews $7, Goals and OKRs $4, Engagement Surveys $4 per employee
- HRIS Foundation is free with any Talent Suite module for purchases by December 31, 2026
Watch out for
- Every account starts with the Agentic HRIS, even if the company already has an HRIS
- The list price is $14/employee/month once the $7 HRIS Foundation is added to the $7 Reviews module
- Multi-module and volume discounts appear only in a custom quote, so the final price needs a sales call
Engagedly
Best for: Mid-market organizations that want performance, learning and engagement in one AI-driven suite
Engagedly bundles performance reviews, OKRs, 360 feedback, learning, engagement and recognition into one suite powered by its Marissa AI assistant. Manage Performance runs $5 to $8 per user a month billed annually, and every suite includes the Marissa AI Coach, workflow automation and the mobile app at no extra cost.
The floor price is the catch. A $7,500 annual minimum means a small team pays the floor rather than the per-user rate, and learning, recognition and engagement are separate suites from $2 per user a month. Engagedly also carries the lowest G2 score among the platforms here at 4.3 out of 5. Pick it when the goal is one connected talent suite, not just a 360 tool.
What we like
- Manage Performance at $5 to $8 per user per month billed annually covers reviews, 360 feedback, goals and OKRs
- Every suite includes the Marissa AI Coach, an AI HR assistant, workflow automation and a mobile app
- Learn and Grow, recognition and engagement modules can be added individually from $2 per user per month
- Mentoring, compensation and deskless-employee modules are available for larger programmes
Watch out for
- A $7,500 annual minimum, so a small team pays the floor rather than the per-user rate
- Modular pricing: learning, recognition and engagement are separate suites from $2 per user per month
- Lowest G2 score among the platforms here at 4.3 out of 5
Culture Amp
Best for: HR-mature organizations above 200 people already running engagement surveys
Culture Amp's 360 sits alongside its engagement surveys, so you can correlate feedback themes with engagement data, and that connection is the reason to choose it. The product covers 360 and self-review cycles, engagement and lifecycle surveys, competency frameworks, people analytics and benchmarking against its large survey dataset, with AI-written summaries per person.
The price is the problem. Culture Amp publishes no price, so it cannot be shortlisted on cost without a sales call, and there is no free plan or free trial. The performance half is also newer than the survey half. Choose Culture Amp when the company already runs engagement surveys and wants the 360 read against them.
What we like
- Its 360 sits alongside engagement surveys, so feedback themes can be correlated with engagement data
- Benchmarking against its large survey dataset, with competency frameworks and people analytics
- AI-written summaries per person on the Perform side, with calibration and continuous feedback
- 4.5 out of 5 on G2 from 1,575 reviews, with reviewers praising the survey science
Watch out for
- No published price, so the tool cannot be shortlisted on cost without a sales call
- No free plan or free trial, and pricing is billed annually
- The performance half is newer than the survey half, and text analytics is not available for 360 surveys
Qualtrics
Best for: Organizations above roughly 1,000 employees with a people-analytics function
Qualtrics 360 Development is part of its employee experience suite, and the analytics are genuinely best-in-class if you have the scale and the team to use them. It covers 360 development, engagement and lifecycle surveys, advanced statistical analysis, text analytics on open comments and benchmarking, with a professional services team that can run deployment for you.
The cost is the barrier. Qualtrics publishes no price, and 360 is sold as coverage added to a People Lifecycle licence priced by employee count, so a buyer is buying more than 360 whether they want it or not. There is no free plan or free trial. Pick Qualtrics only above roughly 1,000 employees, with a people-analytics function to use it.
What we like
- Best-in-class analytics for large programmes, with advanced statistics and benchmarking
- Text analytics on open comments, plus engagement and lifecycle surveys in the same suite
- 360 Development covers self, manager, peer and direct-report views with role-based reporting
- Professional services team can run survey deployment hands-off for the buyer
Watch out for
- No published price; 360 is an add-on to a People Lifecycle licence priced by employee count
- No free plan or free trial, and the suite needs a team to use its analytics well
- Reviewers cite high costs and complexity for smaller organizations
Spidergap
Best for: Targeted leadership 360s in companies of any size, where only a few people get reviewed
Spidergap does one thing and does it properly. The reports are the strongest in this list for a leadership audience, with clear prioritisation of what to act on rather than a wall of averages. Pricing is per person reviewed, not per seat: Starter costs $1,099 a year including 10 recipients, then $89 each, and raters and admins are free.
The model is the whole point, and the whole risk. A company of 500 that reviews 20 executives pays for 20, not 500, but 200 appraisees works out at $18,009 a year on Starter. There is no AI at all, and only two G2 reviews exist for due diligence. Choose Spidergap for a targeted leadership 360, not for company-wide feedback.
What we like
- Pay per person reviewed, not per seat: raters and admins are free, so 20 executives cost $1,099 a year
- Strongest reports here for a leadership audience, with clear prioritisation of what to act on
- Fully customisable competency frameworks, rater nomination workflows and action-planning output
- Unused licences carry over, and a licence lasts 12 months from the date the assessment is created
Watch out for
- Costs escalate quickly for company-wide coverage: 200 appraisees works out at $18,009 a year on Starter
- Only 2 G2 reviews, which is thin for due diligence
- No AI features at all, and no goals, check-ins or engagement tools in the product
CustomInsight
Best for: First-time 360 programmes that need design help as much as software
CustomInsight sits between software and service. You get help designing the competency model, which matters if this is your first 360 and you do not have a framework. Pricing is per participant receiving feedback: a $750 one-time setup, then from about $95 per person reviewed, with unlimited raters and no per-report charge, and one person free to trial.
The setup fee is the catch for small pilots, and there is no aggregate G2 rating to check the vendor against. Per-person pricing also gets costly fast once the programme grows past a few dozen people. Pick CustomInsight when the programme needs design help as much as software, and the first cycle is the one that has to land well.
What we like
- Consultative setup: help designing the competency model, which matters for a first 360
- Unlimited raters per participant, with narrative reports and group and org-level rollups
- No per-report charge, and five off-the-shelf 360 assessments are available
- Used by more than half of the Fortune 100, per the vendor
Watch out for
- No aggregate G2 rating published, so buyer reviews are hard to verify
- The $750 setup makes small pilots proportionally expensive
- Per-person pricing gets costly fast once the programme grows past a few dozen people
Pointerpro
Best for: Consultants running 360s for clients, or a one-off internal exercise
Pointerpro is the strongest survey platform for this use case because it can generate personalised PDF reports automatically, which is the part that usually kills the DIY approach. Professional costs $69 a month billed annually and includes unlimited questionnaires, advanced logic, custom scoring and 2,000 monthly responses, with a 14-day trial.
The catch is that Pointerpro is a survey builder, not a 360 platform. Only one user seat is included, and there is no rater nomination workflow and no anonymity threshold, so that work is built by hand. Higher tiers are all on request. Use Pointerpro for a one-off exercise or client work, not for a recurring company-wide cycle.
What we like
- Strongest survey-builder route here: automated personalised PDF reports for every respondent
- Professional at $69/month billed annually includes unlimited questionnaires and 2,000 monthly responses
- Advanced logic, custom scoring, conditional branching and Zapier and Make integrations
- 4.6 out of 5 on Capterra from 274 reviews, with reviewers praising report quality
Watch out for
- Only one user seat is included on Professional, which makes HR-team administration awkward
- No rater nomination workflow and no anonymity thresholds; that is built by hand
- Higher tiers are all on request, and the G2 pricing page also lists a $109 Lite tier
The best 360 review software collects feedback from a person's manager, peers and direct reports, then turns it into a report someone can actually act on. We ranked the twelve tools below by fit for the most common buyer — a small or mid-sized team running its first company-wide 360 cycle — starting with the cheapest dedicated tools and ending with the survey-builder route, and every price was checked on the vendor's own pricing page, or a vendor-supplied listing, on November 10, 2026.
How to choose the best 360 review software
- Count the appraisees, not the employees. Per-seat tools charge for everyone every month; per-person tools charge only for the people who receive feedback. A 30-person cycle costs $1,080 a year on Effy AI but $2,879 on Spidergap Starter, and the winner flips when only a few leaders get reviewed.
- Decide whether 360 is developmental or evaluative, and say so out loud. If ratings feed promotion decisions, expect inflation. Buy a tool with strong anonymity thresholds, and tell participants the feedback is for development.
- Ask how the tool enforces minimum rater counts. Results should stay hidden until enough raters have answered, so one unhappy peer cannot be identified. Ask the same about comment quality: what happens when someone writes "great job" and nothing else?
- Check what the AI is allowed to decide. Every vendor here markets AI, but none publishes an accuracy rate for it. Ask whether a human has to approve an AI-written summary before the person it describes reads it.
- Pilot on one team. A 360 programme that half the company ignores is worse than none, because it teaches people the exercise is optional. Run one team through a full cycle first.
Before you publish the feedback process to the team, run your announcement titles through the free SERP snippet preview tool — it shows exactly how the title and description will look in Google. And if the 360 is part of a wider review cycle, our guide to performance review software covers the platforms that run the whole thing.
Whatever you shortlist, try it with a real cycle before you pay. The free plans in this list cover 5 to 10 users, and the trials run 14 to 30 days, which is long enough to run one genuine pilot — your questions, your raters, your reports. Check two things in the trial: that raters can complete the survey from a phone without help, and that the report reads clearly to someone who has never seen a 360 before.
360 review software pricing: what you will actually pay
Take the same programme on every tool: 30 people receiving feedback, once a year. On list prices, the subscription costs $828 a year on Pointerpro, $1,080 on Effy AI, $1,800 on PerformYard at the low end of its range, $2,520 on Teamflect billed annually, $2,879 on Spidergap Starter, $3,600 on CustomInsight in the first year, $3,960 on 15Five Perform, $4,000 on Lattice because of its $4,000 annual minimum, and $5,040 on Leapsome at list. Engagedly would cost $1,800 at the low end of its range, but its $7,500 annual minimum makes the real bill $7,500.
Over that one cycle, the same 30 people cost $828 at the cheap end and $7,500 at the dear end — a $6,672 gap that comes entirely from the pricing model, not from features. The two quote-only tools, Culture Amp and Qualtrics, cannot be placed in this comparison at all, which is itself a cost: a buyer cannot shortlist them without a sales call.
Three costs sit outside every number above. First, the add-ons: PerformYard AI at $1 to $3 per person a month, Leapsome's extra modules at $3 to $5, and Engagedly's learning and engagement suites from $2. Second, the minimums: Lattice at $4,000 and Engagedly at $7,500 a year decide the bill for small teams before any per-user maths. Third, the per-person tools scale the other way: Spidergap Starter for 200 appraisees is $18,009 a year, so a company-wide programme on a per-person tool costs far more than on a per-seat one. If the 360 is one part of a wider review cycle, see our guide to employee performance review software for the platforms that run the whole thing.
Annual billing cuts the bill on most tools here: Teamflect Essential drops from $9 to $7 a user a month, and Leapsome's HRIS Foundation is free with a module for purchases by December 31, 2026, which cuts its 30-person bill from $5,040 to $2,520 for the first year. Effy AI, PerformYard, Lattice, 15Five and Engagedly publish no monthly-billing option, so the annual figure is the whole story. One more cost to check before you commit: a second cycle in the same year is a second bill on the per-person tools, while per-seat tools run unlimited cycles for the same subscription.
Know the difference: 360 review software vs a survey tool
The confusion in this category is between a tool that collects answers and a tool that runs a 360 process. A survey tool only builds the form and counts the responses; 360 review software adds rater nomination, anonymity thresholds, automated reminders per relationship type and aggregated per-competency reporting. Pointerpro is the strongest survey-builder route here because it generates personalised PDF reports automatically, but the 360 process itself still has to be managed by hand.
There is a second, quieter confusion: per-seat tools and per-person tools. Effy AI, Teamflect, Lattice, 15Five, Leapsome, PerformYard and Engagedly charge per seat per month and run unlimited cycles, which is the cheapest model when the whole company gets reviewed. Spidergap and CustomInsight charge per person reviewed, which wins when only a handful of leaders get a 360 and loses badly when everyone does. Neither model is better in itself; the question is how many people will actually receive feedback.
A third distinction worth knowing is the platform question. Lattice, 15Five, Culture Amp, Qualtrics, Leapsome and Engagedly sell 360 as one module inside a system that also runs goals, reviews and one-on-ones, so the buyer gets the whole cycle in one login. Effy AI, Spidergap, CustomInsight and Pointerpro do one job, which keeps the price low but means the rest of the review cycle lives somewhere else. Decide which you are buying before comparing prices, because the two scopes do not line up.
Quick comparison: tool type by need
| Buyer | Best pick | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Small team, first 360 cycle | Effy AI | Full cycle from $3/seat/month, free for up to 5 users, G2 4.8 out of 5 |
| Microsoft Teams company | Teamflect | Reviews inside Teams, free plan for up to 10 users, Essential is $9/user/month |
| Fixed review process to match | PerformYard | Most configurable cycles, from $5/person/month billed annually |
| Company past 150 people | Lattice | Deepest review automation, Performance is $10/seat/month, $4,000 annual minimum |
| Managers are the weak link | 15Five | 360s plus check-ins and coaching, Perform is $11/user/month |
| Feedback tied to learning | Leapsome | Low scores route to learning paths, $14/employee/month at list |
| One connected talent suite | Engagedly | Performance, learning and engagement together, from $5/user/month, $7,500 minimum |
| Engagement-led programme | Culture Amp | 360 read against engagement survey data, custom quote |
| Large enterprise programme | Qualtrics | Research-grade analytics, custom quote, needs a people-analytics team |
| Only a few leaders reviewed | Spidergap | Pay per person reviewed, $1,099 a year for 10 recipients |
| First 360, needs design help | CustomInsight | Consultative setup, about $95 per person reviewed plus $750 setup |
| One-off or client 360s | Pointerpro | Personalised PDF reports, Professional is $69/month, one seat only |
Mistakes to avoid
- Counting employees instead of appraisees. A 30-person cycle costs $1,080 a year on Effy AI and $2,879 on Spidergap Starter, and the winner flips when only a few leaders get reviewed. Work out the appraisee count before comparing anything.
- Using 360 feedback for pay and promotion. The moment people know peer ratings affect pay, the ratings stop being honest. Keep 360 developmental, say so explicitly, and use manager reviews and results for promotion decisions.
- Budgeting on the headline price alone. Lattice's $4,000 minimum and Engagedly's $7,500 minimum decide the bill for small teams, and Leapsome's $14 list price is really a $7 HRIS fee plus a $7 module.
- Buying a per-seat platform for a handful of leaders. Reviewing 20 executives on Lattice costs the $4,000 minimum; on Spidergap it costs $1,099 a year. Match the pricing model to the programme, not the brand.
- Skipping the anonymity check. If results show with too few raters, a single unhappy peer can be identified and the next cycle gets polite, useless answers. Ask every vendor how it enforces minimum rater counts before you buy.
How we chose
We checked each vendor's own pricing page, or a vendor-supplied listing, on November 10, 2026 and recorded the starting price exactly as shown, including the annual-billing figure where the page lists one, and we ranked the tools by fit for the most common buyer — a small or mid-sized team running its first company-wide 360 cycle — not by brand size. Two prices need a note: Leapsome's $14 is the list price of its $7 HRIS Foundation plus its $7 Performance Reviews module, with the Foundation free for purchases by December 31, 2026; and Pointerpro's $69 is vendor-supplied, while the G2 pricing page also lists a $109 Lite tier. Spidergap's and CustomInsight's per-person figures were confirmed against their vendor pages as reported on November 4, 2026. Ratings are shown only where a fresh G2 or Capterra page gave a clear score and review count on November 10, 2026: Spidergap carries no rating because it has only 2 G2 reviews, and CustomInsight because no aggregate rating is published. No vendor paid for a place in this list, and none of the links here are affiliate links.
What to do next
Start with the free plan or trial of your top pick and run one real pilot cycle on a single team. Check that raters can finish the survey from a phone without help, that results stay hidden until enough raters have answered, and that the report reads clearly to someone who has never seen a 360 before. If the feedback is sorted but new customers are not finding you, our local SEO service handles the visibility side — or compare the wider platforms in our guide to feedback analytics software. Once your tools are in place, find out what's holding your rankings back.
Your stack only works if people find you
SerpAstra fixes what keeps your site off page one and makes it easy for AI assistants to recommend.
Get a free audit→Sources we checked (24)
- Effy AI pricing — effy.ai/pricing (checked November 10, 2026)
- Teamflect pricing — teamflect.com/pricing (checked November 10, 2026)
- PerformYard pricing — performyard.com/pricing (checked November 10, 2026)
- Lattice pricing — lattice.com/pricing (checked November 10, 2026)
- 15Five pricing — 15five.com/pricing (checked November 10, 2026)
- Leapsome pricing — leapsome.com/pricing (checked November 10, 2026)
- Engagedly pricing — engagedly.com (checked November 10, 2026)
- Culture Amp — cultureamp.com (no published pricing; checked November 10, 2026)
- Qualtrics — qualtrics.com (no published pricing; checked November 10, 2026)
- Spidergap pricing — spidergap.com/pricing (checked November 10, 2026)
- CustomInsight Focal 360 — custominsight.com (checked November 10, 2026)
- Pointerpro pricing — pointerpro.com (checked November 10, 2026)
- Effy AI on G2 — 4.8/5, 37 reviews (checked November 10, 2026)
- Teamflect on Capterra — 4.7/5, 143 reviews (checked November 10, 2026)
- PerformYard on G2 — 4.7/5, 1,260 reviews (checked November 10, 2026)
- Lattice on G2 — 4.7/5, 4,098 reviews (checked November 10, 2026)
- 15Five on G2 — 4.6/5, 1,905 reviews (checked November 10, 2026)
- Leapsome on G2 — 4.8/5, 2,422 reviews (checked November 10, 2026)
- Engagedly on G2 — 4.3/5, 538 reviews (checked November 10, 2026)
- Culture Amp on G2 — 4.5/5, 1,575 reviews (checked November 10, 2026)
- Qualtrics Employee Experience on G2 — 4.4/5, 462 reviews (checked November 10, 2026)
- Pointerpro on Capterra — 4.6/5, 274 reviews (checked November 10, 2026)
- Effy AI 360 feedback guide — vendor-site price checks, September 2026
- 360review.io 360 feedback costs — vendor pricing pages, November 4, 2026
Frequently asked questions
What is the best 360 review software?
Effy AI is the best fit for most small teams: a full 360 cycle from $3/seat/month billed annually, with a free plan for up to 5 users and the highest G2 score here at 4.8 out of 5. Teamflect is the best choice inside Microsoft Teams, and Lattice is the best platform for companies past 150 people.
How much does 360 review software cost?
Entry prices run from $3 to $69 a month per seat, plus two quote-only enterprise tools. A 30-person cycle costs about $1,080 a year on Effy AI, $2,520 on Teamflect billed annually, $3,960 on 15Five Perform and $4,000 on Lattice, because Lattice enforces a $4,000 annual minimum.
Is there free 360 review software?
Yes, for very small teams. Effy AI is free for up to 5 users with full 360 access, and Teamflect has a free Starter plan for up to 10 users. Both are genuine free plans, not trials. Once the team grows past the cap, a paid plan starts at $3 or $9 per user a month.
What is the difference between 360 review software and a survey tool?
A survey tool only collects answers. 360 review software adds rater nomination, anonymity thresholds, automated reminders per relationship type and aggregated per-competency reporting. Pointerpro can build the form and the PDF report, but the 360 process itself has to be managed by hand.
Should 360 feedback be used for pay and promotion decisions?
No, not if you want honest ratings. 360 feedback was designed for development, and the moment people know peer ratings affect pay or promotion, the ratings stop being honest. Use it for development, say so explicitly, and keep promotion decisions on manager reviews and results.
How many raters should each person have in a 360 review?
Aim for at least three raters per relationship type — three peers, three direct reports — plus the manager and a self-review. Most tools here enforce a minimum rater count before showing results, so a single unhappy peer cannot be identified. Fewer raters than that makes the report easy to trace back.
Can I run a 360 review for just a few leaders?
Yes, and that is when per-person tools win. Spidergap charges $1,099 a year for 10 recipients and CustomInsight about $95 per person reviewed, so reviewing 20 executives costs far less than a per-seat platform. For company-wide feedback, per-seat tools are cheaper instead.
Free SEO and AI visibility audit
Find out what is holding your rankings back
Send us your site. Within 2 business days you get a written audit, an AI visibility check and a short fix list ranked by impact. Free, with no contract attached.
Request my free audit→


