Digital Marketing & Ads

12 Best CTV Advertising Measurement Companies in 2026

12 best CTV advertising measurement companies compared on price, G2 ratings and what each one measures. Eleven are custom quote; one is self-serve.

Shamim Mia, Founder, SerpAstraLast verified November 4, 202614 min read

We compare pricing pages, documentation and public reviews. We never accept payment for rankings.

Key takeaways

  • Nielsen ONE, iSpot.tv and VideoAmp are the short-list for cross-platform currency: all three are custom quote, so budget for an annual agreement, not a monthly plan.
  • MNTN is the only self-serve option here: no platform fee and no minimums, with media budgets starting at $5,000 a month on the vendor homepage calculator.
  • The single most important buying factor is what you need measured: audience reach, business outcomes, brand lift or media quality — no one vendor leads on all four.
  • EDO gives agencies free TV Ad Intelligence access during the 2026 Upfront; its Ad EnGage outcome measurement is a paid subscription.
  • Every price below was checked on the vendor's own site on November 4, 2026. Eleven of the twelve publish no starting price; ratings are G2 where shown.
On this page

Quick comparison

Starting prices checked November 4, 2026
ToolBest forStarting priceFree plan
NielsenNational brands and agencies that need one deduplicated reach number across linear TV, CTV and digitalCustom quoteNo
iSpot.tvBrands and agencies that want real-time, always-on TV ad measurement with attention and outcome dataCustom quoteNo
VideoAmpLarge advertisers and agencies that want an alternative TV currency with planning, measurement and activation on one datasetCustom quoteNo
Samba TVAdvertisers that want ACR viewing data and true reach and frequency across linear and streamingCustom quoteNo
EDOAgencies and brands that judge TV on business outcomes — search lift, site visits and sales — rather than reach aloneCustom quoteYes (agencies)
ComscoreMedia buyers and sellers that need cross-platform campaign measurement with local TV depthCustom quoteNo
DoubleVerifyBrands that need independent verification that CTV ads ran in view, in safe environments, to real peopleCustom quoteNo
Integral Ad ScienceAdvertisers that want show-level transparency on streaming — which show, genre and rating their ads ran inCustom quoteNo
InnovidAgencies that serve ads and want measurement from the same independent platform that delivered themCustom quoteNo
MNTNDirect-to-consumer and growth brands that want to run CTV themselves and judge it on site visits and sales$0 platform feeNo (self-serve)
TVisionBrands and networks that need to know whether anyone was actually watching — eyes on screen, not just impressions servedCustom quoteNo
UpwaveBrand marketers who need to prove a CTV campaign moved awareness, recall and purchase intentCustom quoteNo

Make one of these tools?

We re-check this list every quarter. Send a correction, request a review, or ask about a clearly labeled sponsored spot.

Request a listing

The best ctv advertising measurement companies

#1

Nielsen

Best for: National brands and agencies that need one deduplicated reach number across linear TV, CTV and digital

4.2/5 on G2 (12 reviews, checked Nov 2026)
Visit nielsen.com
Starting priceCustom quote (annual enterprise agreement; no published rates)
Free planNo — no free plan; demo on request

Nielsen ONE is the default answer when a buyer asks what the industry transacts on. It blends the national TV panel with census-level digital data to produce one deduplicated reach and frequency number across linear TV, CTV, desktop and mobile, so a campaign that runs everywhere gets measured once, not four times. In February 2026 Nielsen added more than 200 Scarborough advanced audience segments to Nielsen ONE, widening the targeting and reporting options inside the same system.

The price of that position is enterprise process: custom-quote annual agreements, a sales-led onboarding and an implementation that takes time. Panel-based measurement also has blind spots on platforms where Nielsen has no SDK or data partnership. Buy Nielsen ONE when the buy itself is negotiated on Nielsen numbers; for a single CTV test, the onboarding alone outweighs the insight.

What we like

  • Nielsen ONE combines panel data with census digital measurement for deduplicated reach and frequency across linear, CTV, desktop and mobile
  • Still the industry currency for TV: the number buyers and sellers already transact on, and a JIC-certified national TV currency
  • Added more than 200 Scarborough advanced audience segments to Nielsen ONE in February 2026

Watch out for

  • Custom-quote enterprise pricing with no published rates, so small buyers cannot budget without a sales conversation
  • G2 reviewers call the interface slow and hard to navigate, and panel-based measurement has blind spots where Nielsen has no SDK or data partnership
  • Only 12 G2 reviews, so the 4.2 score is a thin signal
#2

iSpot.tv

Best for: Brands and agencies that want real-time, always-on TV ad measurement with attention and outcome data

Visit ispot.tv
Starting priceCustom quote (annual subscription; no published rates)
Free planNo — no free plan; demo on request

iSpot.tv is the always-on option in this list: it catalogues every ad airing in the United States and matches it to viewing captured by automatic content recognition on more than 16 million smart TVs, with direct integrations into 300-plus streaming platforms and DSPs. That gives you reach, frequency and competitive airing data in real time, plus attention metrics and outcome attribution built on causal-impact modelling with a control group.

The catch is access. Pricing is a custom annual subscription with no published rates, and the platform is built for enterprise buyers who measure TV constantly. If you run one CTV flight a quarter, you will pay for a year-round system you barely use. Buy iSpot.tv when TV is a permanent line in your media plan and you need the answer the same day the ad runs.

What we like

  • Real-time measurement of every TV ad, built on ACR data from more than 16 million smart TVs and integrations with 300-plus streaming platforms and DSPs
  • Outcome attribution uses causal-impact modelling with a control group, not just exposed-versus-unexposed counts
  • Ace Metrix creative assessment is bundled in, so the same platform scores the ad and measures its business impact

Watch out for

  • Custom-quote pricing with no published rates, aimed at enterprise buyers
  • G2 shows only about 9 reviews and no published star rating, so public reviewer sentiment is thin
  • No free plan, and the full platform is more than a small advertiser needs for a single CTV test
#3

VideoAmp

Best for: Large advertisers and agencies that want an alternative TV currency with planning, measurement and activation on one dataset

Visit videoamp.com
Starting priceCustom quote (annual enterprise agreement; no published rates)
Free planNo — no free plan

VideoAmp is the currency challenger. Its VALID engine connects census-level TV, streaming and digital viewership with household outcomes, and buyers and sellers can plan, measure and guarantee campaigns on the same dataset. More than 280 publishers have certified VideoAmp cross-platform measurement, 1,000-plus brands measure on it, and the US Joint Industry Committee certified it as a national TV currency company in 2024.

That positioning comes with enterprise weight: annual contracts, negotiated pricing and a platform that covers planning and activation as well as measurement. If your only question is whether a finished campaign worked, VideoAmp is more system than you need. It earns its place when you want one vendor's numbers to carry from the media plan all the way to the guarantee.

What we like

  • VALID big-data engine links census-level TV, streaming and digital viewership to household outcomes on one identity spine
  • Certified as a national TV currency company by the US Joint Industry Committee in 2024, alongside Comscore
  • More than 280 TV, streaming and digital publishers have certified VideoAmp cross-platform measurement, and 1,000-plus brands measure on it

Watch out for

  • Enterprise annual contracts with no published pricing — you negotiate, you do not self-serve
  • G2 carries only 2 reviews, so there is almost no public reviewer signal to check the vendor's claims against
  • A full planning-to-currency platform is heavy for buyers who only need post-campaign measurement
#4

Samba TV

Best for: Advertisers that want ACR viewing data and true reach and frequency across linear and streaming

Visit samba.tv
Starting priceCustom quote (enterprise data licensing and measurement; no published rates)
Free planNo — no free plan (consumer app is free; business platform is not)

Samba TV owns the glass. Its automatic content recognition is embedded at the chipset level in smart TVs from 24 global manufacturers, so it sees what is actually on screen across linear, streaming and gaming — including viewing that never passes through a publisher's own reporting. True Reach and Frequency reporting then shows how much of your buy reached the same households twice, which is the waste most CTV plans hide.

The business side is enterprise-only: custom data-licensing deals with no published rates, and reviewers mention minimum campaign sizes. The consumer Samba TV app is free, which confuses some buyers — the free app is not the measurement product. Buy Samba TV when first-party viewing data, not a panel estimate, is what your planning depends on.

What we like

  • ACR technology embedded in smart TVs from 24 global manufacturers captures glass-level viewing across linear, streaming and gaming
  • True Reach and Frequency reporting shows wasted reach — how much of the buy hits the same households twice
  • Samba AI Suite ties the viewing data to targeting and attribution in the same platform

Watch out for

  • No published B2B pricing — measurement and data licensing are custom enterprise deals
  • G2 carries only 2 reviews for Samba TV for Business, so public reviewer sentiment is almost nonexistent
  • Reviewers note minimum campaign sizes and thinner international coverage outside the US
#5

EDO

Best for: Agencies and brands that judge TV on business outcomes — search lift, site visits and sales — rather than reach alone

Visit edo.com
Starting priceCustom quote (Ad EnGage subscription; no published rates)
Free planYes — free TV Ad Intelligence access for agencies (2026 Upfront season)

EDO is the outcomes company. Ad EnGage matches each TV airing to the search and site-visit lift in the minutes after it runs — the behaviours that predict future sales — and its database covers more than 133 trillion ad impressions, 2.5 million creatives and 35,000 brands, refreshed daily. Ad EnGage Optimize, launched in June 2026, turns that data into frequency caps, creative rotation and planning changes mid-flight.

It is also the only vendor here with a free entry point: agencies get complimentary TV Ad Intelligence access during the 2026 Upfront season. But the free access covers the ad database, not Ad EnGage outcome measurement, which is paid, with no published rates. Start with the free access to test the data; buy Ad EnGage when you need outcomes, not airings.

What we like

  • Ad EnGage connects each TV airing to the search and site-visit lift in the minutes after it runs — behaviour that predicts future sales
  • Syndicated database covers more than 133 trillion ad impressions, 2.5 million creatives and 35,000 brands, refreshed daily
  • Ad EnGage Optimize, launched June 2026, turns the outcomes data into live frequency, creative and planning adjustments

Watch out for

  • Ad EnGage outcome measurement is a paid subscription with no published prices; you negotiate scope and term
  • The free access covers TV Ad Intelligence only — the outcome measurement product itself is not free
  • Outcomes are modelled from engagement signals, so results depend on the quality of the advertiser's own conversion data
#6

Comscore

Best for: Media buyers and sellers that need cross-platform campaign measurement with local TV depth

4.1/5 on G2 (75 reviews, checked Nov 2026)
Visit comscore.com
Starting priceCustom quote (annual enterprise agreement; no published rates)
Free planNo — no free plan

Comscore is the cross-platform workhorse with the deepest local bench. Cross-Platform Campaign Results gives one deduplicated reach number across TV, CTV, desktop and mobile from a single tag, and its TV measurement draws on set-top-box data from more than 75 million televisions, with local measurement in all 210 US markets. Like VideoAmp, Comscore was certified as a national TV currency company by the US Joint Industry Committee in 2024.

The trade-offs are familiar for an enterprise measurement suite: custom-quote pricing, an interface G2 reviewers call complex and dated, and an implementation that averages about three months. One pricing note: G2 lists a $799-a-month Basic figure, but it does not appear on Comscore's own pricing page, so treat it as unconfirmed. Buy Comscore when local-market depth matters as much as national reach.

What we like

  • Cross-Platform Campaign Results (CCR) gives one deduplicated reach number across TV, CTV, desktop and mobile from a single tag
  • TV measurement draws on set-top-box data from more than 75 million televisions, with local measurement in all 210 US markets
  • Certified as a national TV currency company by the US Joint Industry Committee in 2024

Watch out for

  • Custom-quote enterprise pricing; G2 lists a $799-a-month Basic figure, but it is not on Comscore's own pricing page, so we do not present it as verified
  • G2 reviewers call the interface complex and dated, and some question panel-based data accuracy
  • Implementation averages about 3 months on G2, so it is not a quick plug-in for a single campaign
#7

DoubleVerify

Best for: Brands that need independent verification that CTV ads ran in view, in safe environments, to real people

4.1/5 on G2 (78 reviews, checked Nov 2026)
Visit doubleverify.com
Starting priceCustom quote (priced on media volume; no published rates)
Free planNo — no free plan

DoubleVerify answers a different question from the currency vendors: did the ad actually run, in view, in a safe environment, to a real person? Its CTV viewability is MRC-accredited — an ad counts only when it is on screen for two or more seconds — and DV Authentic Streaming TV, launched in January 2026, pairs verification with optimization for streaming. Coverage is wide: DoubleVerify says it covers more than 93% of CTV impressions that provide app transparency.

Fraud is the reason to buy it. DoubleVerify's 2026 Global Insights report found 140% more CTV fraud schemes and variants in Q1 2026 than a year earlier. Pricing is custom and scales with media volume, and one G2 reviewer notes data latency limits real-time pivots. Buy DoubleVerify when verification is the job; pair it with a currency vendor for reach.

What we like

  • MRC-accredited CTV viewability: an ad counts as viewable only when it is fully on screen for 2 or more seconds
  • DV Authentic Streaming TV, launched January 2026, combines verification and optimization for streaming campaigns
  • Covers more than 93% of all CTV impressions that provide app transparency, per DoubleVerify

Watch out for

  • Priced on media volume with no published rates, so the cost scales with every dollar of CTV spend
  • A G2 reviewer notes data latency limits real-time pivots — it verifies well, but not instantly
  • Attention measurement leans on licensed TVision panel data, so part of the product depends on a partner's dataset
#8

Integral Ad Science

Best for: Advertisers that want show-level transparency on streaming — which show, genre and rating their ads ran in

4.3/5 on G2 (10 reviews, checked Nov 2026)
Visit integralads.com
Starting priceCustom quote (priced on media volume; no published rates)
Free planNo — no free plan

Integral Ad Science is the show-level pick. IAS Total TV, launched in April 2026, gives real-time transparency at the show, program, genre, rating and language level across Disney, NBCUniversal, Paramount and Prime Video, plus opted-in publishers on Publica by IAS. Total Media Quality for CTV adds video-level brand safety and suitability measurement through IRIS.TV, so suitability is judged on the actual video, not just the app it ran in.

The limits are coverage and evidence. Total TV only sees opted-in publishers, so a buy spread across smaller apps is partly dark. And the G2 base is thin — 10 reviews — with reviewers calling the price high and the reporting tricky to read. Buy IAS when you need to know which shows your ads ran in; buy DoubleVerify when fraud and viewability are the bigger worry.

What we like

  • IAS Total TV, launched April 2026, gives real-time show, program, genre, rating and language transparency on streaming
  • Total Media Quality for CTV adds video-level brand safety and suitability measurement via IRIS.TV
  • Works directly with the largest video publishers to validate that ads play to completion and are free of invalid traffic

Watch out for

  • Only 10 G2 reviews, so the 4.3 score is a thin signal, and reviewers call the price high and reporting tricky to read
  • Custom-quote pricing with no published rates; verification is sold on media volume
  • Total TV transparency covers opted-in publishers only — Disney, NBCUniversal, Paramount and Prime Video at launch
#9

Innovid

Best for: Agencies that serve ads and want measurement from the same independent platform that delivered them

4.2/5 on G2 (423 reviews, checked Nov 2026)
Visit innovid.com
Starting priceCustom quote (impression-based; no published rates)
Free planNo — no free plan

Innovid is the only vendor here that both serves the ad and measures it. Because measurement comes from the ad server itself, reporting is built on unfiltered delivery data rather than a sampled estimate, and the Harmony Reach and Frequency tools manage duplication across linear and streaming in one plan. An Eicoff case study on Innovid's own site reports a 35% lower cost per response after consolidating measurement on the platform.

It carries the most G2 reviews in this list — 423 — which makes its 4.2 score the best-evidenced rating here. Reviewers still report a steep learning curve, slow support and clumsy asset uploading, and pricing is impression-based with no published rates. Innovid was acquired by Mediaocean for roughly $500 million. Buy it when you want delivery and measurement in one independent stack.

What we like

  • Measurement comes from the ad server itself, so reporting is built on unfiltered delivery data rather than a sampled estimate
  • Harmony Reach and Frequency tools manage duplication across linear and streaming in one plan
  • An Eicoff case study on Innovid's own site reports a 35% lower cost per response after consolidating measurement on the platform

Watch out for

  • G2 reviewers report a steep learning curve and slow support responses, plus inefficient asset uploading
  • Impression-based pricing with no published rates, so costs rise with campaign volume
  • Now part of Mediaocean after a roughly $500 million acquisition, so the roadmap answers to a larger parent
#10

MNTN

Best for: Direct-to-consumer and growth brands that want to run CTV themselves and judge it on site visits and sales

4.8/5 on G2 (61 reviews, checked Nov 2026)
Visit mountain.com
Starting price$0 platform fee (self-serve; media spend is separate, and the vendor homepage calculator starts at a $5,000 monthly budget)
Free planNo — no free plan; self-serve, no minimums

MNTN is the only self-serve buy here, and the highest-rated on G2 at 4.8 from 61 reviews. There is no platform fee, no minimum and no contract, and the platform is built for performance buyers: Verified Visits attribution matches site visits to exposed households, the Incrementality Dashboard compares exposed households against a holdout group, and QuickFrame AI builds a TV-ready spot from a website.

Do not mistake no platform fee for a cheap test. The vendor homepage calculator starts at a $5,000 monthly media budget, which is $60,000 over a year before creative and fees. Older G2 reviewers also cite $10,000-a-month retargeting and $25,000 prospecting minimums — the vendor now says no minimums, so get the current terms in writing. Buy MNTN when you want to run CTV yourself and judge it on visits and sales.

What we like

  • The only self-serve platform here: no platform fee, no minimums and no contracts, per the vendor homepage
  • Verified Visits attribution matches site visits to exposed households, and the Incrementality Dashboard compares exposed and holdout households
  • QuickFrame AI builds TV-ready creative from a website, removing the production blocker for brands without a spot

Watch out for

  • No platform fee, but the vendor homepage calculator starts at a $5,000 monthly media budget — a real test still costs $60,000 over a year
  • Older G2 reviewers cite $10,000-a-month retargeting and $25,000 prospecting minimums; the vendor now says no minimums, so confirm current terms in writing
  • Reviewers note the reporting dashboard lacks a date-comparison view, so trend checks take manual work
#11

TVision

Best for: Brands and networks that need to know whether anyone was actually watching — eyes on screen, not just impressions served

Visit tvisioninsights.com
Starting priceCustom quote (panel-data licensing; no published rates)
Free planNo — no free plan

TVision measures the thing every other vendor in this list assumes: whether anyone was actually watching. Its opt-in panel of 5,000 US households uses computer vision to record, second by second, who is in the room and whether their eyes are on the screen — producing presence, attention and co-viewing data no impression count can give. Because the panel watches the glass, it covers walled gardens as well as open CTV.

The attention-adjusted CPM is the practical payoff: it prices an impression by verified eyes-on-screen time, so a cheap impression nobody saw costs more than an expensive one everyone watched. The limits are scale and independence — 5,000 households is small next to census ACR data, and Viant Technology agreed to acquire TVision for $40 million in April 2026. Buy TVision when attention, not delivery, is the metric you defend.

What we like

  • The only company in this list that measures person-level attention: who is in the room and whether their eyes are on the screen, second by second
  • Attention-adjusted CPM lets buyers compare the effective price of an impression that was actually seen against one served into an empty room
  • Covers walled gardens as well as open CTV, since the panel watches the glass rather than relying on platform-reported data

Watch out for

  • No G2 reviews at all, so there is no public reviewer check on the product
  • A 5,000-household panel is small next to census ACR data, so niche audiences are thinly covered
  • Acquired by Viant Technology for $40 million in April 2026, so its independence as a measurement source is now tied to a buying platform
#12

Upwave

Best for: Brand marketers who need to prove a CTV campaign moved awareness, recall and purchase intent

Visit upwave.com
Starting priceCustom quote (campaign-based; no published rates)
Free planNo — no free plan

Upwave is the brand-lift specialist: the only company in this list that does nothing but measure whether advertising moved the brand. Its real-time dashboard tracks awareness, recall, consideration and purchase intent across CTV, linear, digital, social and retail media, and its Observed and Predictive Brand Lift products cover more campaigns than survey-only studies — 75% of campaigns see results within 7 days, per Upwave.

That focus is also the limit. Upwave does not measure reach or media quality, so it sits beside a currency or verification vendor rather than replacing one. Campaigns also need at least 3 million impressions to qualify for measurement, which rules out small tests. Buy Upwave when the question your CFO asks is whether the campaign changed what people think, not how many saw it.

What we like

  • Measures brand lift in real time across CTV, linear, digital, social and retail media in one dashboard
  • Observed and Predictive Brand Lift cover more campaigns than survey-only lift studies, with 75% of campaigns seeing results within 7 days
  • Bayes, the in-platform AI agent, turns lift data into on-demand analysis and slide-deck reports

Watch out for

  • Brand lift is the whole product — it does not measure audience reach or media quality, so you still need a currency vendor beside it
  • A 3-million-impression minimum threshold applies to campaigns measured on the platform, which rules out small tests
  • No published pricing and no G2 rating, so both cost and reviewer sentiment require a sales conversation

What the best CTV advertising measurement companies measure

The best CTV advertising measurement companies answer one of four questions: how many people saw the ad, what they did next, whether the brand moved, or whether the ad was real and viewable in the first place. No single vendor leads on all four, which is why large advertisers usually run two of them — one for the currency number and one for outcomes or verification. This list is sorted by fit for the most common buyer: a brand or agency team choosing a measurement vendor for a CTV plan, not by brand size.

The money behind the category explains the pricing. eMarketer forecasts US connected TV ad spend at roughly $37.95 billion in 2026, and for the first time CTV upfront commitments have passed primetime linear TV. When that much spend needs proof, measurement becomes a negotiated annual agreement rather than a monthly subscription — which is why eleven of the twelve companies here publish no starting price at all.

CTV measurement pricing: what you will actually pay

Start with the only vendor that publishes a number. MNTN charges no platform fee, and its homepage calculator starts at a $5,000 monthly media budget. Run that for a year and the media alone is $5,000 × 12 = $60,000, before creative and any fees bundled into the CPM. At a typical CTV CPM of $20 to $60, per Integral Ad Science, that $5,000 a month buys roughly 83,000 to 250,000 impressions — at $30 CPM it is about 167,000 impressions a month.

The other eleven vendors quote each engagement, so your year total is a negotiation, not a price. A single-vendor currency agreement with Nielsen, iSpot.tv or VideoAmp is typically a five- or six-figure annual contract, and verification from DoubleVerify or Integral Ad Science is priced on media volume, so it grows with every dollar of CTV spend. Budget for the quote process itself: expect a sales cycle of weeks, and get any minimums — MNTN's old $10,000 retargeting and $25,000 prospecting minimums, Upwave's 3-million-impression threshold — confirmed in writing before you sign.

Bar chart of starting platform fees billed monthly: MNTN $0, all other companies custom quote
Starting platform fees, billed monthly. Only MNTN publishes a platform fee; the other eleven are custom quote.

Know the difference: audience currency vs outcome measurement

The biggest buyer confusion in this category is treating all measurement as the same job. Audience currency — Nielsen ONE, VideoAmp, Comscore — produces the deduplicated reach and frequency number that buyers and sellers transact on. It answers "how many people saw it, and how often" and it is the number your media contract is priced against. Outcome measurement — EDO's Ad EnGage, MNTN's Verified Visits — connects the ad to what happened next: searches, site visits and sales. It answers "did it work" and it is the number your CFO cares about.

Verification is a third job, not a fourth: DoubleVerify and Integral Ad Science check that the ad ran in view, in a safe environment, to a real person. And brand lift — Upwave — is a fourth: whether the campaign changed what people think. A plan that buys only currency knows its reach and nothing about its return; a plan that buys only outcomes cannot prove its reach to a seller. Match the vendor to the question you need answered, and read our guide to marketing attribution software if the outcome side is the gap in your stack.

How to choose CTV measurement that fits your buy

  1. Name the question first. Reach, outcomes, brand lift or media quality — pick one as the primary job, because no vendor leads on all four.
  2. Check who else uses the number. If your media deals are priced on Nielsen, you need Nielsen ONE. If you control your own buying, iSpot.tv or VideoAmp can replace it.
  3. Ask what the data is built on. Panel, census ACR, ad-server logs or survey responses each have blind spots; a vendor that will not explain its data source is a vendor to skip.
  4. Get minimums in writing. Upwave needs 3 million impressions per campaign; older MNTN terms cited $10,000-a-month retargeting minimums; currency vendors negotiate annual minimums.
  5. Separate the measurer from the media. A vendor that also sells inventory has a conflict of interest when it grades its own impressions — prefer an independent measurer, or verify with a second source.

Before you send traffic to a landing page from a CTV campaign, run its title through the free SERP snippet preview tool — it shows exactly how the page will look in Google when viewers search for the brand afterwards.

Matrix showing what each entry plan includes: daily updates, free plan, AI visibility and white-label reporting
What the entry plan includes, checked November 4, 2026. A dash means the feature is not included on the entry plan.

Quick comparison: tool type by need

BuyerBest pickWhy
National brand buying on the industry currencyNielsenNielsen ONE is the number media deals are priced on
Agency that needs same-day answersiSpot.tvReal-time measurement plus causal outcome attribution
Brand that wants an alternative currencyVideoAmpJIC-certified currency with planning on the same data
Team judging TV on sales and visitsEDO or MNTNOutcomes, not reach — EDO for agencies, MNTN for self-serve
Buyer worried about fraud and viewabilityDoubleVerify or IASMRC-accredited verification and show-level transparency
Brand that needs proof of brand liftUpwaveReal-time lift across CTV and linear in one dashboard

How we chose

We checked each vendor's own site on November 4, 2026 and recorded the starting price exactly as shown — which, for eleven of the twelve, means no published price and a custom quote. MNTN is the exception: its homepage states no platform fee and no minimums, with a budget calculator starting at $5,000 a month. Ratings come from G2 pages opened the same day; five companies show a rating, and the rest do not because G2 carries too few reviews to publish one (iSpot.tv, VideoAmp and Samba TV have 2 to 9 reviews each; TVision, Upwave and EDO have none). One figure we did not use: G2 lists a $799-a-month Basic price for Comscore, but it is not on Comscore's own pricing page, so we do not present it as verified. We ranked by fit for the most common buyer — a brand or agency team choosing a measurement vendor — not by brand size. No vendor paid for a place in this list, and none of the links here are affiliate links.

What to do next

Start with the question, not the vendor: reach, outcomes, brand lift or media quality. Then take the free route where one exists — EDO's TV Ad Intelligence access for agencies, or MNTN's self-serve signup — and test the data on a real campaign before you negotiate an annual agreement. If your media deals are priced on Nielsen numbers, shortlist Nielsen ONE first and use a second vendor for outcomes or verification. For the broader picture of how search fits the same budget, our monthly SEO service covers the organic side of the same funnel. Once your tools are in place, find out what's holding your rankings back.

Your stack only works if people find you

SerpAstra fixes what keeps your site off page one and makes it easy for AI assistants to recommend.

Get a free audit→
Sources we checked (24)
Shamim

Shamim

Founder of SerpAstra

A full-stack SEO and digital marketer who spends most days on Local SEO for dental practices, AI search visibility and lead generation.

Frequently asked questions

What is the best CTV advertising measurement company in 2026?

Nielsen ONE is the best pick for most buyers because it is the number the industry already transacts on, with deduplicated reach across linear, CTV and digital. iSpot.tv and VideoAmp are the strongest alternatives for real-time measurement and alternative currency. MNTN is the best self-serve option for performance brands.

How much does CTV measurement cost?

Eleven of the twelve companies here publish no starting price — you negotiate a custom annual agreement, typically priced on media volume, data scope or campaign size. MNTN is the exception: no platform fee, with media budgets starting at $5,000 a month on the vendor homepage calculator, or $60,000 over a year.

What is the difference between audience measurement and outcome measurement?

Audience measurement counts who saw the ad — reach, frequency and demographics — and is what Nielsen, VideoAmp and Comscore sell. Outcome measurement connects the ad to what happened next, such as site visits or sales, and is what EDO and MNTN sell. Most serious CTV plans need both, which is why buyers often run two vendors.

Is there a free CTV measurement option?

Only one, and it is limited. EDO gives agencies free access to its TV Ad Intelligence database during the 2026 Upfront season, but its Ad EnGage outcome measurement is a paid subscription. No other company in this list offers a free plan. MNTN has no platform fee, but you still pay for the media itself.

Do I need Nielsen, or will iSpot.tv or VideoAmp do?

It depends on who you negotiate with. If your media buys are priced on Nielsen numbers, you need Nielsen ONE — no alternative currency settles those deals. If you control your own buying and want faster, always-on measurement, iSpot.tv or VideoAmp can replace it. Many large advertisers run Nielsen for currency and iSpot for day-to-day optimization.

What should I check before signing a measurement contract?

Four things: what data the measurement is built on (panel, ACR census or ad-server logs), whether the price is an annual agreement or media-volume based, what minimums apply to campaigns and impressions, and whether the vendor also sells media. A vendor that sells media has a conflict of interest when it grades its own inventory.

Can one vendor measure both linear TV and CTV?

Yes — Nielsen ONE, iSpot.tv, VideoAmp, Comscore and EDO all measure linear and streaming in one system, with deduplicated reach across both. TVision and Upwave also cover both. The vendors that cannot do this are the specialists: DoubleVerify and Integral Ad Science verify CTV and digital, while MNTN is CTV-only.

Free SEO and AI visibility audit

Find out what is holding your rankings back

Send us your site. Within 2 business days you get a written audit, an AI visibility check and a short fix list ranked by impact. Free, with no contract attached.

Request my free audit→