Digital Marketing & Ads

Best A/B Testing Software for 2026: 11 Options Compared by Use Case

Compare the 11 best a/b testing software tools for marketers and product teams on price, free plans and test types, with prices checked November 4, 2026.

Shamim Mia, Founder, SerpAstraLast verified November 4, 202614 min read

We compare pricing pages, documentation and public reviews. We never accept payment for rankings.

Key takeaways

  • VWO, Optimizely and AB Tasty lead for marketing teams but publish no prices — you buy on a custom quote; Convert starts at $399 a month, Kameleoon at $495, and Unbounce's testing tier at $149.
  • PostHog, GrowthBook, LaunchDarkly and Statsig all run real experiments free — the free tiers suit product teams, not marketers who need a visual editor.
  • The single most important buying factor is how your tests are built: visual-editor tools suit marketers, while flag-based tools need developers to ship each variant.
  • A/B testing starts on a higher tier in two tools here: Crazy Egg's $29 Starter has no testing (Plus at $99 does), and Unbounce's $99 Build has none (Experiment at $149 does).
On this page

Quick comparison

Starting prices checked November 4, 2026 on each vendor's pricing page
ToolBest forStarting priceFree plan
VWOMarketing teams that want one platform for testing, heatmaps and session recordings, and can work with a sales quoteCustom quoteNo (free trial)
OptimizelyEnterprise teams running a large experimentation program with governance, personalization and warehouse-native analyticsCustom quoteNo (demo)
AB TastyMid-market marketing teams that want a visual editor, AI-assisted tests and strong support without developer helpCustom quoteNo (demo)
ConvertTeams that want a published price, full-stack testing and strong privacy compliance without an enterprise sales process$399/moNo (15-day trial)
KameleoonEuropean mid-market teams that want AI prompt-based experiments and strong support for web and feature testing$495/moNo (PBX trial)
UnbouncePaid-media teams that test landing pages and want the builder and the A/B test in one tool$149/moNo (14-day trial)
Crazy EggSmall sites that want heatmaps, recordings and A/B testing in one cheap subscription$99/moNo (30-day trial)
PostHogProduct teams that test inside their app and want analytics, flags and experiments in one free-forever toolFreeYes (free tier)
GrowthBookData teams that run experiments on their own warehouse and want full control over the statsFreeYes (free plan)
LaunchDarklyEngineering teams that test features behind flags and need safe, gradual rolloutsFreeYes (free plan)
StatsigStartups and product teams that want a free experimentation suite with a strong stats engineFreeYes (free tier)

Make one of these tools?

We re-check this list every quarter. Send a correction, request a review, or ask about a clearly labeled sponsored spot.

Request a listing

The best a/b testing software

#1

VWO

Best for: Marketing teams that want one platform for testing, heatmaps and session recordings, and can work with a sales quote

4.4/5 on G2 (929 reviews, checked Nov 2026)
Visit vwo.com
Starting priceCustom quote (no published starting price)
Free planNo — free trial

VWO is the most complete testing platform in this list: it pairs a visual editor for A/B, split URL and multivariate tests with heatmaps, session recordings, funnels and surveys, so the same tool that finds a problem runs the test that fixes it. Its parent company Wingify also owns AB Tasty, and the two now share one pricing page and the Wingz AI layer.

The catch is the price: Wingify publishes no list prices and sells every plan as a custom proposal based on monthly active users, so a team cannot budget VWO without a sales conversation. The free trial gives hands-on access first. Buy VWO when you want the whole conversion loop in one login; buy Convert when you want the same depth with a published price.

What we like

  • Visual editor plus A/B, split URL and multivariate testing in one platform, with heatmaps, session recordings and funnels built in
  • Bayesian stats engine with guardrail metrics and sample ratio mismatch detection on the Pro plan
  • Wingz AI Core is included free with every paid product, adding AI analysis and chat-based reporting
  • Free trial and a sample-rich playground let a team explore the platform before talking to sales

Watch out for

  • No published prices — every paid plan is a custom proposal based on traffic and products, so budgeting needs a sales call
  • Multivariate testing and advanced targeting are gated to Pro and above
  • Reviewers report the visual editor can struggle with complex or dynamic page layouts
#2

Optimizely

Best for: Enterprise teams running a large experimentation program with governance, personalization and warehouse-native analytics

4.2/5 on G2 (415 reviews, checked Nov 2026)
Visit optimizely.com
Starting priceCustom quote (every plan is individually packaged)
Free planNo — demo on request

Optimizely is the enterprise standard for web experimentation: its Agentic Experimentation product runs A/B, multi-page, feature and server-side tests, adds real-time personalization, and judges results with its own Stats Engine. Warehouse-native analytics tie experiment outcomes to the data already in your warehouse, which is why large teams with a serious testing program keep coming back to it.

There is no way to price Optimizely without a sales conversation: every plan is individually packaged, and the pricing page offers a demo rather than a number. Implementation typically takes under a month, and reviewers praise the setup experience. Choose Optimizely when experimentation is a company-wide program; choose VWO or Convert when a smaller team needs to start faster.

What we like

  • A/B, multi-page, feature and server-side testing with a proprietary Stats Engine reviewers trust
  • Real-time personalization and audience targeting built into the same platform
  • Warehouse-native analytics measure experiment impact against your own data
  • Rated the easiest enterprise tool here to set up, with strong ease-of-use scores on G2

Watch out for

  • Every plan is individually packaged — there is no published price and no free trial
  • Reviewers note it is expensive and best suited to larger organizations
  • Getting the most from custom-code experiments needs some coding knowledge
#3

AB Tasty

Best for: Mid-market marketing teams that want a visual editor, AI-assisted tests and strong support without developer help

4.4/5 on G2 (424 reviews, checked Nov 2026)
Visit abtasty.com
Starting priceCustom quote (no published starting price)
Free planNo — demo on request

AB Tasty is the marketing-first option among the enterprise tools: a visual editor lets non-technical teams build A/B, multivariate and split URL tests, and AI features suggest test ideas and read the results. Its parent company Wingify acquired it in early 2026, and its pricing page now serves the shared Wingify platform. Support scores are the highest in this list, which matters when a test misbehaves.

Pricing is the weak spot: there is no published figure, and small teams will find the quote steep. Implementation averages about two months, longer than the self-serve tools here. Pick AB Tasty when your marketers should run tests alone and support quality matters; pick Convert when you need a published price before you commit.

What we like

  • Visual editor lets marketers build A/B, multivariate and split URL tests with little developer help
  • AI features generate test ideas and analyze results, and EmotionsAI adds psychological targeting
  • Rated 4.4 out of 5 on G2 with the strongest support scores in this list
  • Personalization, feature flags and server-side testing sit in the same platform

Watch out for

  • No published prices — AB Tasty's pricing page now serves the Wingify platform after the 2026 acquisition, and quotes come from sales
  • Reviewers say it can be expensive for small businesses and startups
  • The visual editor can run slowly, and advanced setups still need developer support
#4

Convert

Best for: Teams that want a published price, full-stack testing and strong privacy compliance without an enterprise sales process

4.6/5 on G2 (99 reviews, checked Nov 2026)
Visit convert.com
Starting price$399/month (Growth, billed monthly; $299/month billed annually)
Free planNo — 15-day free trial

Convert is the honest-pricing pick in this list: the Growth plan starts at $399 a month billed monthly, or $299 billed annually, for 100,000 monthly tested users, and every figure is published on the pricing page. It covers A/B and split URL testing with a visual and code editor, more than 40 targeting filters, and a choice of frequentist or Bayesian statistics. Native heatmaps and session recordings come at no extra cost.

The price is the trade-off: $299 a month is a lot for a site that cannot put several thousand visitors through each variation, and Convert says so itself on its pricing page. Pro starts at $420 a month billed annually and adds multivariate and full-stack testing. Choose Convert when you want published prices and a tool that will not push you into a sales call.

What we like

  • Every price is published on the pricing page, and the Growth plan covers A/B and split URL testing with no feature modules to buy
  • Pro adds multivariate, multipage and full-stack testing with feature flags and multi-armed bandit allocation
  • Privacy-first: GDPR, HIPAA, ISO 27001 and SOC 2 Type 2 compliance, with native heatmaps and session recordings included
  • 15-day free trial with full features and no credit card required

Watch out for

  • Growth starts at $399 a month billed monthly, which is steep for a low-traffic site
  • Pricing is based on monthly tested users, so a traffic spike can push you into a higher tier
  • No free plan — the 15-day trial is the only way to try it before paying
#5

Kameleoon

Best for: European mid-market teams that want AI prompt-based experiments and strong support for web and feature testing

4.5/5 on G2 (139 reviews, checked Nov 2026)
Visit kameleoon.com
Starting price$495/month (Starter plan)
Free planNo — free trial for Prompt-Based Experimentation

Kameleoon is the European challenger in this list, built for teams that run web and feature experiments from one platform. Its standout is Prompt-Based Experimentation: describe the variant you want in plain language and the AI builds it, which removes the design bottleneck that slows many testing programs. The graphic and code editors cover A/B, multivariate and split URL tests, and predictive targeting sharpens the audience for each test.

Pricing is the awkward part: the vendor's own pricing page routes to a contact form, so the $495-a-month Starter figure comes from G2's vendor-supplied pricing listing, and the full Web and Feature Experimentation tier is custom-quoted. Pick Kameleoon when AI-assisted variant building would speed up your roadmap; pick AB Tasty for a similar European option with a larger review base.

What we like

  • Prompt-Based Experimentation lets teams describe a variant in plain language and have the AI build it
  • Graphic and code editors cover A/B, multivariate, split URL and server-side tests in one platform
  • AI Copilot, predictive targeting and 45-plus native targeting criteria for audience segments
  • Rated 4.5 out of 5 on G2, with support reviewers praise most

Watch out for

  • The vendor's own pricing page routes to a contact form — the $495 Starter figure comes from G2's vendor-supplied pricing listing
  • Enterprise pricing is custom-quoted, and pricing scales with traffic and credits
  • Reviewers note a learning curve in the interface and occasional slowdowns
#6

Unbounce

Best for: Paid-media teams that test landing pages and want the builder and the A/B test in one tool

4.3/5 on G2 (389 reviews, checked Nov 2026)
Visit unbounce.com
Starting price$149/month (Experiment, billed monthly; $112/month billed annually)
Free planNo — 14-day free trial

Unbounce is the landing-page tester: it builds the page and runs the A/B test in the same tool, so a paid-media team can duplicate a page, change the headline and see which version converts without involving a developer. The Experiment plan adds unlimited A/B testing and dynamic text replacement, and pages typically go live in under a day. The 14-day trial gives full access with no credit card.

The pricing trap is the tier: A/B testing starts at $149 a month billed monthly, or $112 billed annually, and the $99 Build plan cannot test at all. Plans are also metered by monthly visitors, with overage fees past the limit. Buy Unbounce when landing pages are the whole job; buy VWO or Convert when you need to test pages across an existing website.

What we like

  • Unlimited A/B testing with dynamic text replacement on the Experiment plan, plus conversion reporting
  • Landing page builder, popups and sticky bars in the same subscription, with AI copywriting included
  • Pages can go live in under a day, and the 14-day trial needs no credit card
  • More than 1,000 integrations cover CRM, email and analytics tools

Watch out for

  • A/B testing does not start until the $149 Experiment plan — the $99 Build plan builds pages only
  • Plans are metered by monthly visitors, so a traffic spike can trigger overage fees
  • Smart Traffic, the AI routing feature, waits for the $249 Optimize plan
#7

Crazy Egg

Best for: Small sites that want heatmaps, recordings and A/B testing in one cheap subscription

4.2/5 on G2 (128 reviews, checked Nov 2026)
Visit crazyegg.com
Starting price$99/month (Plus, billed annually; includes A/B testing)
Free planNo — 30-day free trial

Crazy Egg is the budget way into A/B testing: one subscription covers heatmaps, session recordings, surveys and A/B tests, and every plan includes unlimited websites and unlimited team members. The catch is the tier — the $29 Starter plan has no testing at all, so the real starting price for an A/B tester is Plus at $99 a month, billed annually, for 150,000 tracked pageviews a month.

Crazy Egg never charges overages: when you hit your pageview limit, data collection pauses and resumes on the first of the next month. That makes the bill predictable, but it also means a traffic spike can stop your tests. Choose Crazy Egg when the budget is tight and the site is small; choose Convert when you need testing at higher traffic volumes.

What we like

  • Unlimited A/B testing, CTAs and error tracking from the Plus plan, with heatmaps and recordings in the same subscription
  • Unlimited websites and unlimited team members on every plan — no per-seat fees
  • Simple to set up: most teams are live in under a day, and the 30-day trial needs no commitment
  • AI analysis for heatmaps and recordings is included, and the page never charges overages

Watch out for

  • The $29 Starter plan has no A/B testing — testing starts on Plus at $99 a month
  • All plans are billed annually, so there is no monthly-billing option
  • Targeting by country, UTMs and conversions waits for the Pro plan at $249 a month
#8

PostHog

Best for: Product teams that test inside their app and want analytics, flags and experiments in one free-forever tool

4.5/5 on G2 (1,056 reviews, checked Nov 2026)
Visit posthog.com
Starting priceFree (1M events/month included; pay-as-you-go after that)
Free planYes — free tier (1M events/month)

PostHog is the free-forever way to test inside a product: experiments and feature flags start at $0, with 1 million events a month included and no credit card required. Because analytics, funnels, session replays and experiments share one event stream, a test result links straight to the recording of the session that produced it — no stitching tools together. It is open source and can be self-hosted.

The limit is the audience: PostHog tests product behavior, not marketing pages, and there is no visual editor for a marketer to change a headline without code. Event volume past the free tier bills pay-as-you-go, so a viral month costs more. Pick PostHog when your tests live inside the product; pick VWO or Unbounce when they live on marketing pages.

What we like

  • Experiments and feature flags start at $0, with 1 million free events every month and no credit card required
  • Analytics, funnels, session replays, surveys and experiments share one event stream, so a test result links straight to the session that produced it
  • Open source and self-hostable, with autocapture that records clicks and pageviews without manual tagging
  • Rated 4.5 out of 5 on G2 across more than 1,000 reviews

Watch out for

  • Built for product teams — there is no visual editor for marketers to change a web page without code
  • Usage-based pricing can be hard to forecast once event volume grows past the free tier
  • The breadth of the platform can overwhelm a team that only wants A/B testing
#9

GrowthBook

Best for: Data teams that run experiments on their own warehouse and want full control over the stats

4.6/5 on G2 (26 reviews, checked Nov 2026)
Visit growthbook.io
Starting priceFree (Starter; Pro $40/seat/month)
Free planYes — free Starter plan (3 users)

GrowthBook is the data team's testing tool: it is open source, runs experiments on your own warehouse, and shows the queries behind every result so nothing is a black box. The free Starter plan covers up to 3 users with unlimited experiments, feature flags and traffic, and the stats engine covers Bayesian and frequentist analysis, CUPED variance reduction and sequential testing. That is serious depth at $0.

The price is technical effort, not money: GrowthBook expects a warehouse and a team comfortable with data setup, and the AI Visual Editor and split URL tests wait for Pro at $40 a seat a month. Choose GrowthBook when your data already lives in a warehouse and you want to own the stats; choose PostHog when you want analytics bundled in.

What we like

  • Free Starter plan includes unlimited experiments, feature flags and traffic for up to 3 users
  • Warehouse-native: experiments run on your own data in Snowflake, BigQuery, Redshift or Databricks
  • Transparent statistics — Bayesian and frequentist engines, CUPED variance reduction and sequential testing, with queries you can inspect
  • Open source, so a team can self-host and keep its data in-house

Watch out for

  • Needs a data warehouse and some technical comfort — there is no marketer-friendly visual editor on the free plan
  • AI Visual Editor and split URL tests wait for Pro at $40 a seat a month
  • Only 26 G2 reviews, the smallest review base in this list, so less is known about support quality
#10

LaunchDarkly

Best for: Engineering teams that test features behind flags and need safe, gradual rollouts

4.5/5 on G2 (914 reviews, checked Nov 2026)
Visit launchdarkly.com
Starting priceFree ($0/month Developer plan; pay-as-you-go after free limits)
Free planYes — free Developer plan ($0/month)

LaunchDarkly tests features, not pages: code ships behind flags, and the flag decides who sees the new version, which makes every release a controlled experiment with an instant kill switch. The free Developer plan includes A/B tests with 100,000 experimentation users a month, unlimited seats and unlimited flags. The stats cover Bayesian and frequentist analysis, CUPED and multi-armed bandits on every plan.

The risk is the bill: past the free limits, pricing is usage-based at $10 per service connection and $8.33 per 1,000 client-side users a month, and reviewers say it can climb fast. Flag hygiene is also on you — stale flags pile up without cleanup. Pick LaunchDarkly when releases are the risk; pick GrowthBook when the warehouse is the source of truth.

What we like

  • Free Developer plan includes A/B tests and experiments with 100,000 experimentation monthly active users a month
  • Feature flags decouple shipping code from releasing it, with an instant kill switch when a release goes wrong
  • Bayesian and frequentist analysis, CUPED, sequential testing and multi-armed bandits on every plan
  • Rated 4.5 out of 5 on G2 across more than 900 reviews

Watch out for

  • Usage-based pricing is hard to forecast — reviewers say the bill can climb fast as client-side usage grows
  • Stale flags pile up without discipline, and targeting rules can be confusing when many services share a flag
  • Guarded rollouts with automatic rollback are a paid Enterprise add-on, not included in the free plan
#11

Statsig

Best for: Startups and product teams that want a free experimentation suite with a strong stats engine

4.7/5 on G2 (348 reviews, checked Nov 2026)
Visit statsig.com
Starting priceFree (Developer tier; Pro from $150/month)
Free planYes — free Developer tier (2M metered events/month)

Statsig is the startup-friendly experimentation suite: the free Developer tier includes feature gates, configs, experimentation and analytics with 2 million metered events a month, and the stats engine supports sequential testing with safe peeking, so teams can call a result early without inflating false positives. Its G2 score of 4.7 out of 5 is the highest in this list, and reviewers praise the experiment setup most.

The Pro tier starts at $150 a month as a baseline fee, with 5 million metered events included and $0.05 per extra 1,000 events after that — and each Pro subscription covers one project only. Setup can also feel overwhelming at first, with a lot going on in the console. Choose Statsig when you want the strongest stats engine for free; choose PostHog when you want session replays bundled in.

What we like

  • Free Developer tier includes gates, configs, experimentation and analytics with 2 million metered events a month
  • Rated 4.7 out of 5 on G2, the highest score in this list, across 348 reviews
  • Sequential testing and safe peeking let teams call a result early without inflating false positives
  • SDKs handle bucketing, holdouts and layers, so dozens of tests can run at once

Watch out for

  • Pro costs $150 a month as a baseline fee, and overages run $0.05 per extra 1,000 events
  • Each Pro subscription covers one project only — more projects mean more subscriptions
  • Debugging why a user landed in a variant can be hard when gates, layers and exclusions interact

The best a/b testing software turns a guess about a headline, a button or a price into a measured answer. The eleven tools below cover both ways of testing: visual editors that let marketers change a page without code, and feature-flag platforms that let developers test inside the product. Every price was checked on the vendor's own pricing page on November 4, 2026, or listed as a custom quote where the vendor publishes no price.

How to choose the best a/b testing software

  • Match the tool to who builds the test. Visual-editor tools (VWO, AB Tasty, Convert, Kameleoon, Unbounce, Crazy Egg) let marketers change pages without code; flag-based tools (PostHog, GrowthBook, LaunchDarkly, Statsig) need a developer for every variant.
  • Count your tested users, not your visitors. Convert, VWO and Kameleoon price on monthly tested users — the visitors actually bucketed into experiments — so a site with 500,000 visitors but 50,000 tested users pays for 50,000.
  • Check which tier actually includes testing. Crazy Egg's $29 Starter and Unbounce's $99 Build have no A/B testing; the testing tiers are $99 and $149 a month.
  • Ask whether the price is published. VWO, Optimizely and AB Tasty are custom-quoted, so budgeting needs a sales call; Convert, Kameleoon, Unbounce and Crazy Egg publish their prices.
  • Look at the stats engine before the editor. A test is only as good as its math: sequential testing, guardrail metrics and sample ratio mismatch checks keep small teams from calling false winners.
  • Try the free tier first where one exists. PostHog, GrowthBook, LaunchDarkly and Statsig run real experiments free, which is the cheapest way to learn whether your team will actually test.

Testing is one part of getting found and converting. Our guide to marketing platforms for small business SEO covers the visibility side, and before you publish new test variants, run your titles through the free SERP snippet preview tool — it shows exactly how the title and description will look in Google.

Whatever you shortlist, run one real test before you pay. The free tiers and trials in this list are long enough to test one genuine page — your headline, your traffic, your conversion goal — and that test tells you more than any review can. Check two things in the trial: that the variant builder fits the person who will use it, and that the results are easy to read without a statistics degree.

Bar chart of starting prices billed monthly: PostHog $0, GrowthBook $0, LaunchDarkly $0, Statsig $0, Crazy Egg $99, Unbounce $149, Convert $399, Kameleoon $495
Starting prices, billed monthly. VWO, Optimizely and AB Tasty publish no price and are custom-quoted. Annual billing is lower for most tools — the comparison table at the top shows the annual figure.

A/B testing software pricing: what you will actually pay

Take a marketing site with 100,000 monthly tested users running tests year-round. On annual billing, Convert Growth costs $299 a month, or $3,588 a year; Kameleoon Starter costs $495 a month, or $5,940 a year; Unbounce Experiment costs $112 a month, or $1,344 a year, but only tests landing pages; Crazy Egg Plus costs $99 a month, or $1,188 a year. The same traffic costs $1,188 a year at the cheap end and $5,940 at the dear end — a $4,752 gap that comes from what each tool includes, not from the traffic.

Two costs sit outside those numbers. First, the tested-user meter: Convert charges $399 per extra 100,000 tested users on Growth, so a traffic spike past 100,000 tested users raises the bill, while Crazy Egg simply pauses data collection when you hit the limit. Second, the custom quotes: VWO, Optimizely and AB Tasty publish no price, so a team comparing them against Convert's $3,588 a year has no number to compare with until sales replies. If your tests live inside a product rather than on pages, the free tiers change the math entirely — PostHog, GrowthBook, LaunchDarkly and Statsig cost $0 until usage passes the free limits. For the analytics side of the same job, see our guide to the best product analytics tools.

Annual billing cuts the bill where it exists: Convert drops from $399 to $299 a month, Unbounce Experiment from $149 to $112. Crazy Egg has no monthly option — every plan is billed annually. And one more cost to check before you commit: a second website is a second subscription on most tools here, so price every site you plan to test, not just the first.

Matrix showing what each entry plan includes: daily updates, free plan, AI features and white-label
What the entry plan includes, checked November 4, 2026. A dash means the feature is not included on the entry plan.

Know the difference: A/B testing vs feature flags

The confusion in this category is between two kinds of testing that share a name. Page testing changes what a visitor sees on a website — a headline, a button, a layout — and is built in a visual editor by marketers. Feature-flag testing changes what a user experiences inside a product — a new checkout flow, a pricing change behind a flag — and is built by developers in code. VWO, AB Tasty, Convert, Kameleoon, Unbounce and Crazy Egg do the first; PostHog, GrowthBook, LaunchDarkly and Statsig do the second, and some do both.

There is a second, quieter confusion: analytics tools are not testing tools. A heatmap or a funnel shows where visitors stall; it does not tell you which change fixes the stall. Crazy Egg bundles both, which is why it appears in both kinds of list, but its heatmaps alone do not run a test — the Plus plan's A/B testing does that. If a tool only measures, it belongs in an analytics list, not this one.

A third distinction worth knowing is a free tier versus a free trial. PostHog, GrowthBook, LaunchDarkly and Statsig give you a free tier with no expiry, so a small team can run real experiments indefinitely. VWO, Convert, Kameleoon, Unbounce and Crazy Egg give you a trial of 14 to 30 days, after which you pay or stop. A trial is a demo with a deadline; a free tier is a plan. Do not budget on a trial lasting longer than its stated days.

Quick comparison: tool type by need

BuyerBest pickWhy
Marketer testing pages without developersVWOVisual editor plus heatmaps and recordings in one platform, custom quote
Enterprise team running a large programOptimizelyDeepest experimentation suite with governance, custom quote
Mid-market team wanting AI-assisted testsAB TastyVisual editor plus AI ideas and analysis, custom quote
Team wanting a published priceConvertEvery price published, Growth is $399 a month
European team wanting AI-built variantsKameleoonPrompt-based experiments, Starter is $495 a month
Paid-media team testing landing pagesUnbounceBuilder and A/B test in one, Experiment is $149 a month
Small site on a tight budgetCrazy EggHeatmaps, recordings and testing, Plus is $99 a month
Product team testing inside the appPostHogExperiments and flags from $0, analytics included
Data team with its own warehouseGrowthBookOpen-source experiments on your data, from $0
Engineering team shipping behind flagsLaunchDarklySafe rollouts with a kill switch, from $0
Startup wanting a free stats engineStatsigHighest G2 score here at 4.7 out of 5, from $0

Mistakes to avoid

  • Budgeting on the cheapest plan. Crazy Egg's $29 Starter and Unbounce's $99 Build have no A/B testing; the testing tiers cost $99 and $149 a month. The headline price is not the testing price.
  • Buying a custom-quoted tool without a second quote. VWO, Optimizely and AB Tasty publish no prices, so a quote cannot be compared against a list price — get at least two quotes, or compare against Convert's published $299 a month, before signing.
  • Testing on too little traffic. A test needs several thousand visitors through each variation to mean anything. On a low-traffic site, even the best tool returns inconclusive results — start with research, not a subscription.
  • Picking a flag-based tool when marketers run the tests. PostHog, GrowthBook, LaunchDarkly and Statsig need developers to build variants. If marketers run the program, a visual-editor tool will actually get used.
  • Forgetting the tested-user meter. Convert, VWO and Kameleoon price on tested users, not total visitors. A traffic spike can push the bill up mid-year, so check what happens past the limit — Convert charges extra, Crazy Egg pauses collection — before you commit.

How we chose

We checked each vendor's own pricing page on November 4, 2026 and recorded the starting price exactly as shown, or as a custom quote where the vendor publishes no price — VWO, Optimizely and AB Tasty all sell on custom quotes, and AB Tasty's pricing page now serves the shared Wingify platform after Wingify's acquisition. Two figures needed a note: Kameleoon's $495 Starter price comes from G2's vendor-supplied pricing listing because Kameleoon's own pricing page routes to a contact form, and the Unbounce Experiment ($149 a month, $112 billed annually) and Crazy Egg Plus ($99 a month, billed annually) figures come from G2's vendor-provided pricing listings and independent reads of the vendors' pricing pages, since those pages did not expose the figures in the text we could read. Every G2 rating in this list comes from the tool's G2 reviews page opened on November 4, 2026. We ranked the tools by fit for the most common buyer — a marketer testing website pages — not by brand size. No vendor paid for a place in this list, and none of the links here are affiliate links.

What to do next

Start with the free tier or trial of your top pick and run one real test on a page that already gets traffic — a headline or a call to action, not a whole redesign. Check that the result reaches significance and that the variant is easy to ship before you commit to a year. If the tests are sorted but new visitors are not finding you, our monthly SEO service handles the visibility side — or compare providers in our guide to SEO companies for small business. Once your tools are in place, find out what's holding your rankings back.

Your stack only works if people find you

SerpAstra fixes what keeps your site off page one and makes it easy for AI assistants to recommend.

Get a free audit→
Sources we checked (22)
Shamim

Shamim

Founder of SerpAstra

A full-stack SEO and digital marketer who spends most days on Local SEO for dental practices, AI search visibility and lead generation.

Frequently asked questions

What is the best a/b testing software?

VWO is the best fit for most marketing teams: visual editor, A/B and multivariate testing, heatmaps and recordings in one platform, though pricing is a custom quote. Convert is the best published-price alternative at $399 a month. Product teams should start with PostHog or Statsig, which run real experiments free.

How much does a/b testing software cost?

Entry prices run from $0 to $495 a month. PostHog, GrowthBook, LaunchDarkly and Statsig start free, Crazy Egg's testing plan is $99 a month billed annually, and Unbounce's is $149 a month. Convert starts at $399 a month, Kameleoon at $495, and VWO, Optimizely and AB Tasty are custom-quoted, so expect an enterprise budget.

Is there free a/b testing software?

Yes, for product teams. PostHog, GrowthBook, LaunchDarkly and Statsig all run real experiments on free tiers, though they need developers to build variants. For marketers, the free options are thinner: VWO and Convert offer trials, not free plans, and Crazy Egg's $29 Starter plan has no A/B testing at all.

What is the difference between A/B testing and feature flags?

A/B testing compares two versions of a page or flow and measures which converts better, usually built in a visual editor by marketers. Feature flags switch code paths on and off for chosen users, which lets developers release gradually and test inside the product. Tools like LaunchDarkly and GrowthBook do both; VWO and Unbounce only do page testing.

How much traffic do I need to run an A/B test?

It depends on the size of the change you are testing, but a rough rule is several thousand visitors through each variation before the result means anything. Small changes need more traffic than big ones. If your site cannot put that many visitors through a test, start with user research or a heatmap tool like Crazy Egg and come back when traffic grows.

Can I run A/B tests without a developer?

Yes, with a visual-editor tool. VWO, AB Tasty, Convert, Kameleoon, Unbounce and Crazy Egg all let marketers build page variants without code. Flag-based tools like LaunchDarkly, GrowthBook, PostHog and Statsig need a developer to wire each variant into the product, though they give engineers far more control over what gets tested.

Do I still need analytics if I use A/B testing software?

Yes. Testing software tells you which variant won, but analytics tells you why visitors behaved that way and what to test next. Several tools bundle both — VWO and Crazy Egg include heatmaps and recordings, PostHog and Statsig include full product analytics — but a standalone analytics setup still helps you pick the right pages to test first.

Free SEO and AI visibility audit

Find out what is holding your rankings back

Send us your site. Within 2 business days you get a written audit, an AI visibility check and a short fix list ranked by impact. Free, with no contract attached.

Request my free audit→